YieldLearn: An interpretable machine-learning pipeline for estimating yield-related traits based on physiological indicators
Zhang, X.; Shaterian, H.; Ashe, P.
Show abstract
Efficient yield prediction under field conditions remains a key challenge for crop breeders and agronomists. YieldLearn is an interpretable machine-learning pipeline developed to estimate yield-related traits in durum wheat (Triticum durum) using physiological indicators measured by the Hansatech Instruments Pocket PEA. The workflow integrates fluorescence parameters (Area, Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, PI Inst.) with field-measured agronomic traits (Booting, Height, Maturity, Lodging, Yield kg/plot, and Adjusted Yield kg/ha). Five supervised learning algorithms multinomial logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine (radial kernel), k-nearest neighbors, and decision tree were evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. Models achieved average classification accuracy around 0.57 with AUC values exceeding 0.58. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) visualizations revealed that high Fv/Fm and PI Inst. values were positively associated with yield potential, whereas elevated Fo indicated stress-induced yield reduction. An interactive Shiny App enables real-time prediction and feature-importance exploration. Given the small sample size (165 plots) and absence of environmental covariates such as temperature or soil moisture, YieldLearn should be regarded as a reproducible exploratory framework rather than a production-ready predictor. Nonetheless, it offers a valuable foundation for guiding experimental design, validating physiological indicators, and supporting the next generation of scalable, interpretable crop-yield models.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of harvest-related traits in barley using high-throughput phenotyping data and machine learning 96%
- A High-Throughput Physiological Functional Phenotyping System for Time- and Cost-Effective Screening of Potential Biostimulants 96%
- Enviromic assembly increases accuracy and reduces costs of the genomic prediction for yield plasticity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Kinetic parameter prediction using neural networks identifies limitations to C4 photosynthesis 94%
- Automated Hyperspectral Vegetation Index Derivation Using A Hyperparameter Optimization Framework for High-Throughput Plant Phenotyping 93%
- Higher adaxial stomatal density is associated with lower grain yield in spring wheat 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- High-throughput Phenotyping of Soybean Biomass: Conventional Trait Estimation and Novel Latent Feature Extraction Using UAV Remote Sensing and Deep Learning Models 95%
- RhizoVision Crown: An Integrated Hardware and Software Platform for Root Crown Phenotyping 94%
- From neglecting to including cultivar-specific per se temperature responses: Extending the concept of thermal time for plant development modeling 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- HydroShoot: a functional-structural plant model for simulating hydraulic structure, gas and energy exchange dynamics of complex plant canopies under water deficit - application to grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) 94%
- Phenomics data processing: Extracting dose-response curve parameters from high-resolution temperature courses and repeated field-based wheat height measurements 93%
- Improved Ensemble Performance by Weight Optimisation for the Genomic Prediction of Maize Flowering Time Traits 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-trait random regression models increase genomic prediction accuracy for a temporal physiological trait derived from high-throughput phenotyping 94%
- Development of a model estimating root length density from root impacts on a soil profile in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br). Application to measure root system response to water stress in field conditions 93%
- Site-specific machine learning predictive fertilization models for potato crops in Eastern Canada. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.