Divergent Eosinophilic and Paradoxical Inflammatory Adverse-Event Signatures Across Five Type 2 Asthma Biologics: A FAERS Active-Comparator Disproportionality Analysis
Iancu, A. C.; Kobtan, M.; Soliman, N.; Abdellatif, S.
Show abstract
Background: Five biologics target sequential nodes of the type 2 (T2) inflammatory axis in severe asthma and have each been anecdotally linked to eosinophilic or paradoxical inflammatory adverse events. Whether these reflect a class effect or drug-specific signatures is untested. Methods: We performed a case-noncase disproportionality analysis of FAERS, 2022-2024. Asthma-indication reports naming tezepelumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or omalizumab as primary suspect were compared against the pooled other four (active-comparator design) across 7 pre-specified eosinophilic, vasculitic (including EGPA), cutaneous, and ocular outcomes. A signal was robust if the reporting odds ratio (ROR) 95% CI lower bound exceeded 1 and a Bayesian criterion was also met. Results: Among 50,360 reports (dupilumab n=29,652; mepolizumab n=8,846; omalizumab n=5,484; benralizumab n=4,372; tezepelumab n=2,006), benralizumab showed robust signals for EGPA (ROR 5.06), vasculitis (ROR 4.60), and peripheral eosinophilia (ROR 1.80). Mepolizumab showed a robust vasculitis signal (ROR 1.85); its similarly sized EGPA association narrowly missed the robustness criterion despite significance after correction for multiple testing. Dupilumab showed no EGPA/vasculitis excess but a robust ocular-inflammation signal (ROR 7.81). Tezepelumab and omalizumab showed no robust signal in any domain. EGPA/vasculitis onset occurred earlier after dupilumab (median 20-44 days) than anti-IL-5-axis agents (median 195-550 days; p[≤]0.012); mepolizumab's signal did not reproduce over the full 2015-2024 window (calendar-time confounding). Conclusion: FAERS active-comparator analysis reveals drug-specific, not class-uniform, adverse-event reporting patterns: anti-IL-5-axis agents disproportionately report EGPA/vasculitis, and dupilumab disproportionately reports ocular inflammation with markedly earlier onset. These hypothesis-generating signals cannot establish causality and require confirmation through case-level or comparative pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Namilumab or infliximab compared to standard of care in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 (CATALYST): a phase 2 randomised adaptive trial 91%
- Inhaled budesonide in the treatment of early COVID-19 illness: a randomised controlled trial 91%
- A randomised clinical trial of azithromycin versus standard care in ambulatory COVID-19 – the ATOMIC2 trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes associated with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and immune modifying therapies: a nationwide cohort study in the OpenSAFELY platform 93%
- Incidence and management of inflammatory arthritis in England before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-level cohort study using OpenSAFELY 89%
- Outcomes with and without outpatient SARS-CoV-2 treatment for patients with COVID-19 and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: A retrospective cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydroxychloroquine and Tocilizumab Therapy in COVID-19 Patients - An Observational Study 89%
- Biologics for pediatric atopic dermatitis A protocol of A systematic review and meta - analysis 88%
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.