Back

Zika virus oncolytic signaling reverts immunosuppressive and angiogenic glioblastoma microenvironment in vitro and in vivo

Pinheiro Alves de Freitas, G.; Quintanilla, J. H.; Janeiro, J. M.; Brechko, O.; Weinstock, R.; Cardoso Atella, G.; Villanueva Andrade, M.; C.C.G. Ferreira, J.; M.de Vasconcelos, J.; Vianez, J.; Bellio, M.; TANURI, A.; Dubois, L. G.; R. S. Lima, F.; Moura-Neto, V.; M. Higa, L.; Pestana Garcez, P.

2026-09-22 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.09.20.752714 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor, remains refractory to conventional therapies, characterized by high relapse rates and poor clinical prognosis. Oncolytic viruses represent a promising therapeutic frontier; specifically, Zika virus (ZIKV) has shown potent oncolytic activity against GBM in vitro and in vivo. However, its impact on the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that ZIKV modulates pivotal TME components, triggering paracrine anti-angiogenic signaling that impairs endothelial stabilization and reprogramming microglia toward an anti-tumoral phenotype. These findings were corroborated in vivo in GBM-bearing mice. Using unbiased RNA-Seq, we identified type III interferon (IFN) signaling as the primary mediator of this ZIKV-induced TME remodeling. Crucially, analysis of human glioma datasets revealed that the type III IFN receptor complex is highly expressed in patients, identifying a high-risk population equipped with the molecular machinery to respond to this axis. Exogenous treatment with type III IFN in vitro and in vivo successfully mimicked ZIKV's anti-tumoral effects, reducing angiogenesis and promoting immune activation. Our results demonstrate that ZIKV acts as an immunotherapeutic agent capable of shifting the TME toward an anti-tumoral state, highlighting the type III IFN pathway as an actionable vulnerability and a promising strategy for patients failing conventional therapies.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.