Back

In vivo Quantitative Tomography of 225Ac Daughters in a Prostate Cancer Mouse Model with a Compton Camera

Das, B.; Bidkar, A. P.; Naik, S. A.; Negut, V.; Goodman, D.; Streicher, M.; Lee, J.; Matousek, O. H.; Heller, R.; Basak, M.; Liu, B.; Seo, Y.; Flavell, R. R.; Caravaca, J.

2026-09-22 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.18.752779 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted alpha therapy with 225Ac is a promising modality for cancer treatment, as shown in recent preclinical and clinical studies. Preclinical imaging of 225Ac is essential to fully understand the biokinetics of developmental 225Ac radiopharmaceuticals. Although single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is typically used to achieve this in vivo, conventional preclinical scanners struggle to provide high contrast and accurate quantification for 225Ac imaging due to the very low injected activities (below 1 kBq/g), the unfavorable gamma-ray branching ratios (<26%), and its complex decay chain with several gamma-ray emissions. In this work, we employ a compact CZT-based Compton camera to achieve quantitative tomography of 225Ac daughters in live mice at 18.5 kBq (0.5 Ci) injected activities. Three mice bearing 22Rv1 prostate cancer subcutaneous xenografts were scanned in a single bed position for 30 minutes following intravenous administration of 18.5 kBq of the Anti-CD46 225Ac-Macropa-PEG4-YS5 conjugate. We successfully visualized the in vivo biodistributions of the 225Ac daughters 221Fr and 213Bi, distinguishing between the tumor xenograft and the central organs. Quantification of the tumor uptake from the images revealed an activity as low as 1.1 kBq. In vivo activity quantification computed from the images was compared to ex vivo biodistribution measurements using a gamma counter after harvesting the tissue, showing strong agreement.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.