A quantitative approach to assess similarity between dives under the Buhlmann decompression algorithm constraints
Currens, J.; Tillmans, F.; Papadopoulou, V.
Show abstract
Undersea and high-altitude operations regularly put operators at risk for decompression sickness (DCS), which is attributed to bubble formation and growth during decompression. DCS mitigation strategies are validated with empirical testing, often conducted in hyperbaric chambers, which provide precise control of the pressure-time profile. A degree of variability for study outcome is anticipated in both decompression sickness (DCS) and venous gas emboli (VGE) endpoints. Experimentation in a chamber offers precision, but is not always practical or operationally relevant, leading researchers to use open water for the dive exposure. Dive profile consistency may vary by diver skill level and environmental conditions, potentially introducing dive profile deviations, which may be a factor of individual variability. There does not exist a quantitative framework for evaluating dive profile consistency and quantifying deviations in open water studies. In this work, we evaluate existing dive profile metrics and propose a workflow to estimate dive profile deviations using the Buhlmann dissolved gas phase model. The dive profile metrics included depth and time-based calculations, as well as surface gradient factor, degree-of-conservatism and the root mean square error of the Buhlmann tissue compartments. We developed a set of simulated dive profiles and obtained a set of 40 open water dives previously collected by certified divers, both of which were used to evaluate performance of the dive profile metrics. Depth and time-based metrics offered sensitivity to varying depths and time durations of the dive profiles, respectively. For the field dives, we found the Buhlmann root mean square error metric performed best at identifying the deviation profile, followed by pressure root time. These evaluations demonstrate the utility and limitations of previously published dive profile metrics and emphasize the importance of accounting for dive profile consistency in open water decompression trials.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Cough Transport in an Aircraft Cabin 92%
- Characterizing the effect of impeller design in plant cell fermentations using CFD modeling 91%
- Modeling of aerosol transmission of airborne pathogens in ICU rooms of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory failure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting Decompression Sickness Risk and Mobility in the Context of the SmartSuit, a Hybrid Planetary Spacesuit 94%
- Efficient long-term cryopreservation of Arthrospira platensis NIES-39 and adaptation for the Space Algae-2 spaceflight experiment 93%
- MicroAge Mission: Experimental Design, Hardware Development and Operational Considerations for a Bespoke Culture System to Support Tissue-Engineered Skeletal Muscle Constructs. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in player position running velocity at lactate thresholds among male professional German soccer players 90%
- Time-resolved molecular measurements reveal changes in astronauts during spaceflight 89%
- Effective Assessments of a Short-duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue before Physical Exercise 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scaling-Up Vertical-Wheel Bioreactors Based on Cell Aggregate Exposure to Shear Stress and Energy Dissipation Rate 91%
- Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Hemodynamics for Varying Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Angles and Flow Pulsation 91%
- Precision in Spinal Cord Injury Research: A Novel Electromagnetic Impactor for a Consistent Porcine Model 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.