Evaluation of an AI-Powered Patient Education Application in Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
Samaan, J. S.; Nguyen, S. T.; Hamamah, S.; Tran, A.; Ceasar, R. C.; Wolfe, N.; Yu, T.; Chavez, D.; Rajeev, N.; Advani, R.; Watson, R.; Abu Dayyeh, B.; Sandhu, K.; Wong, H. J.; Tatonetti, N. P.; Samakar, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundPatient education is critical to safe and effective postoperative bariatric surgery care. Large language models (LLMs) may improve access to personalized patient education but evidence regarding direct patient use in clinical settings remains limited. We evaluated BariBot, an LLM-powered educational application for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. MethodsWe conducted a prospective, single-arm mixed-methods feasibility study at a tertiary academic medical center from May 2024 to May 2025. Adult patients undergoing bariatric surgery used BariBot independently on postoperative day 1. The application provided conversational postoperative education and adapted language complexity to participants educational attainment. Outcomes included feasibility, usability, acceptability, perceived trustworthiness, and anticipated future use. Usability was assessed using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Immediately after BariBot use, participants completed a semi-structured qualitative interview assessing acceptability, perceived trustworthiness, and anticipated future use. Interview transcripts underwent thematic analysis. ResultsSixteen participants completed the BariBot use session, SUS assessment, and post-intervention interview. No technical failures prevented application use, and no participant requested early discontinuation. The median SUS score was 91.3 (IQR, 81.3-98.1), consistent with excellent perceived usability. Qualitative analysis showed that participants valued the applications immediacy, structured responses, conversational context, ability to address follow-up questions, judgement-free nature, and future availability between clinical encounters. Trust was strengthened by alignment with prior clinical guidance and perceived institutional association, although participants emphasized the need for transparency, clinician oversight, and use as an adjunct rather than a replacement of clinician guidance. ConclusionsBariBot was feasible to implement and was associated with high perceived usability and acceptability postoperatively after bariatric surgery. Larger, longitudinal, and comparative studies are needed to evaluate safety during unsupervised use and determine whether LLM-based educational applications improve patient understanding, engagement, and clinical outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 93%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A typology of physician input approaches to using AI chatbots for clinical decision-making: a mixed methods study 94%
- Utilization of Generative AI-drafted Responses for Managing Patient-Provider Communication 93%
- Ambient scribe in general practice: a multi-perspective before-after longitudinal mixed-methods study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 93%
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 92%
- Applications and barriers to use of an mHealth iPhone application for self-management of chronic recurrent medical conditions: A Pilot Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 92%
- Feasibility trial of a new digital training package to enhance primary care practitioners' communication of clinical empathy and realistic optimism 92%
- Evaluation of Large Language Models in Medical Examinations:A Scoping Review Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.