Time-to-Statin Prescription for Primary Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Missouri: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Che Ngang, I.; Zewde, E. K.; Gopalsamy Ramaswamy, S.; Anandarajah, A.; Bowe, B.; Odeny, B.
Show abstract
Background: Individuals undergoing lung cancer screening (LCS) represent a population at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), yet opportunities for cardiovascular prevention during screening encounters may be underutilized. While prior studies have examined whether statins are prescribed in eligible patients, little is known about the timing of statin initiation following LCS, particularly among statin-naive individuals. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using electronic health record data from a large academic health system in Missouri. Adults aged 50-80 who underwent LCS between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023, were statin-naive, and met 2019 ACC/AHA criteria for primary prevention were included. The primary outcome was time-to-statin initiation following LCS. Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate timing and predictors of statin initiation across demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic subgroups. Results: Among 3,100 statin-eligible, statin-naive individuals who had undergone LCS, only 27.3% were prescribed a statin within one year of LCS. Uptake accrued gradually (10.5% by 90 days; 17.8% by 180 days; 23.2% by 270 days; 27.1% by 360 days). In adjusted models, earlier statin initiation was independently associated with a higher ASCVD risk category, a cardiology visit in the year preceding LCS, and former (versus current) smoking; older age and male sex were associated with slower initiation. Race, insurance type, and area deprivation were not independently associated with time-to-statin initiation. Conclusions: Despite high ASCVD risk, most statin-eligible patients undergoing LCS did not receive timely statin therapy. Earlier initiation tracked calculated ASCVD risk and specialty (cardiology) contact rather than race, sex, insurance, or area deprivation. Because most patients at high calculated risk still went untreated, integrating cardiovascular risk assessment and preventive decision support into LCS workflows may help reduce missed opportunities for ASCVD prevention.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 93%
- Long-term Outcomes of Peripheral Artery Disease In Veterans: Analysis of the PEripheral ARtery Disease Long-term Survival Study (PEARLS) 93%
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 92%
- Association of Mortality and Aspirin Prescription for COVID-19 Patients at the Veterans Health Administration 92%
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 91%
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 90%
- The Association Between the Rate of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers Use and the Number of Covid-19 Confirmed Cases and Deaths in the United States: Geospatial Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Health Service Rates Among Residents of Retirement Homes and Other Older Adult Populations in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study 88%
- Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in aCute Coronary syndromes (TC4) – A Bayesian pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial 88%
- Risk factors for retirement home COVID-19 outbreaks in Ontario, Canada: A population-level cohort study 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.