3D Segmentation of Pathological Muscle with a Physics-Informed Latent-Regularized U-Net
Mehrabi, N.; Pegard, N. C. R.; Handsfield, G. G.
Show abstract
Objective: We developed a data-efficient deep learning framework for three-dimensional segmentation of pathological musculoskeletal anatomy from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when only limited manual annotations are available. Methods: We developed a Physics-Informed Latent-Regularized U-Net (PILR-U-Net) that combines transfer learning from healthy MRI, latent-space anatomical regularization, and elasticity-based physics-informed constraints. The physics-informed loss enforces mechanical equilibrium, near-incompressibility, and spatial smoothness of predicted deformation fields. The framework was evaluated on MRI datasets from 50 participants with cerebral palsy across 15 lower-limb musculoskeletal structures using sparse manual annotations. Performance was assessed using volumetric overlap, boundary accuracy, volume error, sensitivity, and precision. Ablation experiments evaluated the individual contributions of latent-space and physics-informed regularization. Results: Our experimental results show accurate segmentations with three-dimensional Dice coefficients ranging from 0.750 to 0.943 across evaluated structures, while most structures exhibited low surface-distance errors. Predicted deformation fields maintained positive Jacobian determinants near unity and smooth strain-energy distributions. Ablation analysis showed that both regularization components improved performance, with removal of physics-informed regularization producing the largest reductions in Dice accuracy and increases in boundary error. Conclusion: PILR-U-Net enables accurate and anatomically plausible segmentation of pathological musculoskeletal MRI under sparse supervision. Significance: Incorporating anatomical priors and biomechanical constraints into deep segmentation networks may reduce dependence on extensive pathological annotations and support patient-specific musculoskeletal modeling and clinical analysis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 94%
- Triplanar ensemble U-Net model for white matter hyperintensities segmentation on MR images 94%
- MISPEL: A supervised deep learning harmonizationmethod for multi-scanner neuroimaging data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-modality image translation of 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging to 7 Tesla using Generative Adversarial Networks 95%
- Deep Bayesian networks for uncertainty estimation and adversarial resistance of white matter hyperintensity segmentation 94%
- Anatomy-guided, modality-agnostic segmentation of neuroimaging abnormalities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinically-feasible white matter fiber tractography in peritumoral zones with cerebral vasogenic edema 95%
- Offline Reconstruction of Diffusion MRI Acquisitions for Comparison Between Complex PCA-based and AI-based Denoising 94%
- Deep Learning Based Cardiac Cine Segmentation – Transfer Learning Application to 7T Ultrahigh-Field MRI 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.