Large Language Model-derived Symptom Clusters and Patient Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer from MIMIC-IV Clinical Notes
Lee, Y.; Dinov, I.; Hu, X.; Jiang, Y.
Show abstract
Background: Prior research on symptom clusters (SCs) in colorectal cancer (CRC) has relied primarily on patient-reported outcome surveys, which capture symptom experience at discrete assessment points rather than the continuous documentation generated during routine care, leaving open whether SCs derived from electronic health record (EHR) text carry the same clinical meaning and predictive value. To construct and validate patient-level symptom co-occurrence networks from large language model (LLM), extracted symptom data in CRC patients, and to test whether resulting SCs predict clinical outcomes. Methods: Using a zero-shot LLM extraction pipeline previously benchmarked against a manually annotated ground truth (Macro F1=0.70 for the best-performing model), we extracted 46 symptoms from 2,728 discharge notes of 1,507 CRC patients in MIMIC-IV. Patient-level symptom co-occurrence networks were constructed independently from Gemini 3.5 Flash and Claude Haiku extractions using phi correlation and Louvain community detection, with sensitivity analyses across correlation thresholds, random seeds, note-aggregation strategy, and bootstrap resampling. Per-cluster symptom burden scores were tested as predictors of in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, and 1-year mortality using logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, and (in sensitivity models) metastatic disease. Results: Both LLMs' networks converged on three clinically coherent SCs (Systemic, Gastrointestinal, and CRC Disease-Specific) across sensitivity analyses (cross-model Adjusted Rand Index=0.727; 100-seed Louvain ARI=0.985; bootstrap ARI=0.733). The Systemic Symptom Cluster was the most consistent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR=1.33) and 1-year mortality (OR=1.41), while the CRC Disease-Specific Cluster specifically and independently predicted 30-day readmission (OR=1.20); both associations were robust to adjustment for metastatic disease. Conclusion: LLM-extracted symptom data recover clinically coherent, reproducible SCs from unstructured discharge notes that carry independent prognostic value for mortality and readmission, supporting the clinical validity of automated, EHR-derived symptom profiling in CRC.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models improve transferability of electronic health record-based predictions across countries and coding systems 92%
- Interpretable Fine-tuned Large Language Models Facilitate Making Genetic Test Decisions for Rare Diseases 91%
- High-Sensitivity Pan-Cancer AI Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis via Uncertainty Quantification 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating and Mitigating Limitations of Large Language Models in Clinical Decision Making 90%
- Determinants of Severity in Cancer Patients with COVID-19 Illness 89%
- Psychiatric disorders and self-harm across 26 adult cancers: cumulative burden, temporal variation, excess years of life lost and unnatural causes of deaths 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transformer-based deep learning model for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer in primary care based on electronic health record data 92%
- irAE-GPT: Leveraging large language models to identify immune-related adverse events in electronic health records and clinical trial datasets 90%
- Consistent Performance of GPT-4o in Rare Disease Diagnosis Across Nine Languages and 4967 Cases 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Metrics to Methods: A Scoping Review of Large Language Models for Detection of Social Drivers of Health in Clinical Notes 91%
- Collaborative Large Language Models for Automated Data Extraction in Living Systematic Reviews 91%
- Is One Run Enough? Reproducibility of Flagship Large Language Models Across Temperature and Reasoning Settings in Biomedical Text Processing 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 90%
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 90%
- Automated Identification of Patients with Immune-related Adverse Events from Clinical Notes using Word embedding and Machine Learning 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.