Genomic Research as a Critical Pathway to Diagnosis for Individuals with Rare Disease
O'Donnell-Luria, A.; DiTroia, S.; OLeary, M. C.; Pais, L.; Ganesh, V. S.; Lemire, G.; OHeir, E.; Neale, A.; Pham, A.; VanNoy, G. E.; Mangilog, B. E.; Singer-Berk, M.; Sanchis-Juan, A.; Snow, H.; Abouhala, S.; Agu, S.; Amin, M.; Baxter, S. M.; Blankenmeister, B.; Bujakowska, K. M.; Carlston, C. M.; Choufani, S.; Covill, L. E.; England, E. M.; Glaze, C.; Goodrich, J.; Groopman, E.; Laricchia, K.; Kern Lovgren, A.; Ma, J.; Martinez, E.; Mighton, C.; OLeary, B.; Osei-Owusu, I. A.; Pajusalu, S.; Romo, L.; Russell, K.; Sangermano, R.; Seaby, E.; Serrano, J.; Shah, G.; Singh, M.; Socarras, K. M.; Ste
Show abstract
Many individuals with rare monogenic disease remain molecularly undiagnosed due to challenges accessing genetic testing, ambiguity in interpretation of uncertain variants, and latency between novel disease-gene discovery and adoption into clinical pipelines. The Rare Genomes Project (RGP) provides a remote, research-based genomic sequencing (GS) service for rare disease families to overcome diagnostic barriers while advancing the understanding of the genetic basis of rare disease. Short-read GS and family-centered analysis were performed to identify causes of primary disease. Variants meeting return criteria were clinically confirmed and returned to families. Since 2017, RGP enrolled clinically heterogeneous, undiagnosed rare disease families from all fifty states, Washington DC, and Puerto Rico. Findings were returned to 272 of 1014 sequenced families, resulting in a solve rate of 23.3% and a returned strong candidate rate of 3.5%. Condition-specific return rates ranged from 15% to 40% with many families receiving a result in a known disease gene after healthcare access challenges. Research interventions contributed to returns in 16% of all families and included variants in recently discovered or non-coding disease genes, additional functional studies to resolve variant uncertainty, and real-time data sharing to empower novel disease-gene discovery. RGP demonstrates that a research-based, patient-driven remote sequencing study can effectively bridge a diagnostic gap for rare disease families underserved in current clinical care. This study also underscores the clinical utility of GS with frequent re-analysis and highlights the critical continued role of research in variant interpretation, method innovation, and genomic knowledge base expansion for rare disease diagnosis.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- One in seven pathogenic variants can be challenging to detect by NGS: An analysis of 450,000 patients with implications for clinical sensitivity and genetic test implementation 94%
- The Importance of Automation in Genetic Diagnosis: Lessons from Analyzing an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Cohort with the Mendelian Analysis Toolkit (MATK) 94%
- A Framework for Automated Gene Selection in Genomic Screening 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Returning Actionable Genomic Results in a Research Biobank: Analytic Validity, Clinical Implementation and Resource Utilization 94%
- The Utility of Ultra-Deep RNA sequencing in Mendelian Disorder Diagnostics 94%
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy Type 1 Using Rare Variant Linkage Analysis and Long Read Genome Sequencing 93%
- Combined Bioinformatic and Splicing Analysis of Likely Benign Intronic and Synonymous Variants Reveals Evidence for Pathogenicity 91%
- 3-hour genome sequencing and targeted analysis to rapidly assess genetic risk 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.