A Causal Multi-modal AI Model Stratifies Residual Risk and Identifies Candidates for Treatment Escalation in Node-Positive HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer
Bachelot, T.; Chabaud, S.; Lemonnier, J.; Cottu, P. H.; Dalenc, F.; Howard, F. M.; Pusztai, L.; Tang, C.; Biswas, D.; Zeng, K.; Witowski, J.; Geras, K. J.; Andre, F.; Penault-Llorca, F. M.
Show abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic biomarkers that estimate residual recurrence risk after standard adjuvant therapy to guide further treatment escalation are an unmet clinical need. This study used Ataraxis Breast CTX, a causal multi-modal AI model integrating clinical variables and histopathology, to stratify residual risk in clinically defined high-risk patients. We aimed to identify patients who have excellent outcomes on standard-of-care chemoendocrine therapy and patients who may benefit from additional therapies such as everolimus or CDK4/6 inhibitors. METHODS CTX combines clinical variables with image features from H&E images to produce estimates of recurrence risk (CTX-prognostic) and chemotherapy benefit (CTX-benefit). Prospective-retrospective validation was performed in the phase III UNIRAD trial to assess CTX-prognostic's performance in the subset of patients who had not received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, who had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and who had H&E slides available (n = 556). The primary endpoint in this study was disease-free survival (DFS). As an exploratory analysis, we evaluated CTX-benefit's ability to predict benefit from adjuvant everolimus. RESULTS CTX-prognostic effectively stratified patients into high- and low-risk groups. Across all patients, 5-year DFS was significantly higher in the low-risk group (93%) than in the high-risk group (80%). Additionally, treatment benefit from everolimus differed significantly by CTX-benefit score in an exploratory multivariable analysis adjusting for age, tumor size, nodal status, grade, and menopausal status (interaction p = 0.01). CONCLUSION CTX identified patients with good outcomes under chemoendocrine therapy alone and patients with residual risk who may benefit from treatment escalation. Additionally, CTX was found to be predictive of everolimus benefit. These results suggest that CTX may effectively stratify clinically high-risk HR+/HER2- patients by residual risk and may inform selection of adjuvant escalation strategies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostic model including the benefits and harms of radiotherapy 94%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 94%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune gene expression profiling reveals heterogeneity in luminal breast tumors 94%
- A prospective study on tumour response assessments methods after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in early oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer 93%
- COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a cohort at the Institut Curie hospitals in the Paris area 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 94%
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 94%
- NDRG1 expression is an independent prognostic factor in inflammatory breast cancer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Postmastectomy Radiotherapy in pN1 Breast Cancer: Survival Outcomes and Prognostic Factors From a Single-Institution Cohort 95%
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 95%
- BREAst screening Tailored for HEr (BREATHE) - A Study Protocol On Personalised Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening Programme 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.