Neural Fingerprinting based on Brain Network Dynamics: A Cross-Platform MEG Study
Beer, A. Y.; Gohil, C.; Tanner, Z.; Rier, L.; Hill, R. M.; Holmes, N.; Ferring, D.; Shah, V. M.; Woolrich, M.; Brookes, M. J.
Show abstract
Neural fingerprinting seeks to identify individuals based on measurements of brain activity, exploiting the fact that aspects of brain function unique to an individual remain stable across repeated scans. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a powerful technique for fingerprinting. However, most MEG studies have used conventional (SQUID-based) MEG technology and typically rely on data aggregated over time, overlooking the rich temporal dynamics available in MEG. Here, using SQUID-MEG and the more recently introduced OPM-MEG, we showed fingerprinting was possible within and between modalities using static (time-aggregated) features; this is consistent with previous work. We further asked whether fingerprinting was possible based on network dynamics, estimated using a canonical hidden Markov model (CHMM). Results showed that the CHMM-derived networks provide a better fit to SQUID data than to OPM data; however, this effect was small and to be expected given the canonical networks were trained on SQUID data. We further showed that fingerprinting was possible within and between modalities using CHMM-derived state activation time courses and state power spectral densities. However, state summary statistics and transition probabilities only supported within modality fingerprinting. Our findings suggest that subject-specific information is preserved within CHMM states and across MEG technologies. This represents an important step towards advancing our understanding of brain dynamics, and particularly the brain networks delineated by the CHMM. The study also supports the future use of the CHMM for processing and interpretation of OPM-MEG data.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of automated and manual co-registration for magnetoencephalography 95%
- How long is long? Word length effects in reading correspond to minimal graphemic units: An MEG study in Bangla 93%
- Percent amplitude of fluctuation: a simple measure for resting-state fMRI signal at single voxel level 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.