Back

A Physiologically Detailed Biomechanical Model of the Mouse Distal Forelimb for Simulation of Fine Motor Control

Lindo Sandoval, N.; Gilmer, J. I.; Al Borno, M.; Cuenu Velasco, A. G.; Huber, D.

2026-09-21 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.14.751232 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This study presents a physiologically detailed biomechanical model of the mouse distal forelimb that incorporates intrinsic musculature, tendon routing, and digit-level skeletal anatomy, features simplified or omitted in existing musculoskeletal models. Using high-resolution anatomical reconstruction and computational modeling, we created a physiological representation of the wrist and digits capable of simulating complex forelimb movements. The model enables simulation of coordinated distal forelimb movement and digit-level muscle behavior during grasping-related tasks. Simulations were performed for multiple tasks, including grasping, grasping with supination, wrist flexion, and digit I flexion, with analysis focused on the grasping task due to its integration of both intrinsic and extrinsic musculature. Model performance was evaluated through comparisons of marker trajectories between torque-driven reference motion and muscle-driven simulations, temporal shuffle control, and comparisons between experimentally recorded electromyography (EMG) activity and model-predicted muscle excitation profiles. The model successfully reproduced coordinated distal forelimb kinematics, demonstrated strong agreement between torque-driven and muscle-driven simulation approaches, and generated physiologically plausible muscle excitation patterns consistent with experimentally observed EMG activity during grasping-related movement. These findings establish the model as a framework for studying fine motor control, neuromuscular coordination, and movement-related impairments in mice while providing a foundation for future investigation of neurological disorders and their underlying biomechanical mechanisms.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.