Comparative Genomics of COBRA-like Genes in Theobroma and Herrania Reveals Structural Conservation and Lineage-Specific Variation
Oliveira, R. P.; Almeida, J. V. d. A.; Trinca, V.; Ballaben, A. S.; Oliveira, M. d. M.; Varani, A. d. M.
Show abstract
COBRA-like (COBL) genes encode plant-specific proteins associated with cell-wall organization, cellulose deposition, and developmental processes. Despite their functional relevance in model plants and crops, this gene family remains poorly characterized in Amazonian Malvaceae species. Here, we performed a comparative genomic analysis of COBL genes in two Theobroma grandiflorum clones, two T. cacao cultivars, and Herrania umbratica. Using homology searches, conserved domain validation, phylogenetic reconstruction, gene structure analysis, chromosomal mapping, transcript abundance profiling, molecular modeling, and selection tests, we identified 62 COBL genes across the analyzed genomes. COBL copy number varied among genomes, with T. cacao Matina showing the largest repertoire. All retained proteins contained the conserved COBRA domain and grouped into the two major COBL subgroups previously described in angiosperms, with subgroup-specific exon-intron organization largely conserved across species. Genomic distribution and duplication classification indicated contributions from tandem, segmental, dispersed, and proximal duplications, suggesting that multiple genomic processes shaped COBL family organization in Theobroma and Herrania. Phylogenetic analyses further recovered a putative lineage-specific COBL clade within the analyzed Malvaceae, indicating lineage-specific variation in this gene family. Structural modeling indicated overall conservation between representative proteins from this clade and COBL6-associated proteins, although localized amino acid differences were observed within the COBRA domain. Selection analyses supported predominant purifying selection across the family, with limited evidence of episodic diversifying selection in specific lineages and no significant branch-level signal within the putative lineage-specific clade after correction. Overall, these results provide a comparative framework for COBL gene evolution in Theobroma and Herrania and identify candidate genes for future functional studies on cell-wall-related traits in economically important Malvaceae crops.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional characterization of genes mediating cell wall metabolism and responses to plant cell wall integrity impairment 94%
- Origin, evolution and diversification of plant mechanosensitive channel of small conductance-like (MSL) proteins 94%
- Identification of High Blanchability Donors, Candidate genes and Markers in Groundnut 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The architecture of resilience: a genome assembly of Myrothamnus flabellifolia sheds light on desiccation tolerance and sex determination 93%
- Functional and comparative genomics reveals conserved noncoding sequences in the nitrogen-fixing clade 93%
- Structure and sequence evolution in the pennycress (Thlaspi arvense) pangenome 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-Wide Discovery and Characterization of Terpene Synthases Contributing to Strawberry Aroma Metabolism 93%
- Regulation of Crassulacean Acid Metabolism at the protein level in the CAM plant Kalanchoë laxiflora 93%
- Atypical endo-β-1,4-mannannases are necessary for normal glucomannan synthesis in Arabidopsis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide association study in a diverse grapevine collection provides insights into the genetic basis of berry size and cluster architecture traits 94%
- Identification of candidate flowering and sex genes in white Guinea yam (D. rotundata Poir.) by SuperSAGE transcriptome profiling 93%
- Contrasting a reference cranberry genome to a crop wild relative provides insights into adaptation, domestication, and breeding 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.