Back

Predicting and Explaining WASH Inequities in Nigeria A Machine Learning Approach to Accelerate NTD Elimination

Dorbor, N. L.; Babale, S. K.; Alege, G.

2026-09-15 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.09.14.26363014 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) remain key risk factors for neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) in Nigeria. However, the complex, non-linear determinants of household WASH access are poorly understood, limiting targeted NTD control. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of 30,045 households from the nationally representative 2024 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS). Four supervised machine learning models -- Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost -- were trained to predict improved household WASH access. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC. Explainability was achieved using SHAP values and feature importance. Results XGBoost achieved the highest performance: 83.3% accuracy, 86.9% precision, 92.3% recall, 89.5% F1-score, and AUC 0.877. Random Forest performed similarly with AUC 0.868. SHAP analysis identified household wealth index, improved sanitation, place of residence, and water availability at handwashing stations as the top predictors. Rural households in northern Nigeria and those in the lowest wealth quintiles had the lowest predicted probability of improved WASH. Conclusions Explainable machine learning effectively identifies populations most vulnerable to WASH inequities. Targeting low-wealth, rural households in northern Nigeria with integrated WASH interventions could yield the greatest gains for NTD control. Our open-source code provides a reproducible framework for evidence-based resource allocation.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.