HCM-PhenotypeNet: Deep Multimodal Phenotyping of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy from Echocardiographic Video and Clinical Data
Almadani, A. S.; Sarwar, A.; Agu, E.; Ahluwalia, M.; Kpodonu, J.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a heterogeneous condition with variable morphology and symptoms, leading to adverse outcomes such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure and sudden cardiac death. Data-driven phenotyping may help refine risk stratification and guide management. Objectives: To propose an automated machine learning framework (HCM-PhenotypeNet) that integrates echocardiographic video and clinical data to identify clinically meaningful HCM phenotypes. Methods: We developed a multimodal pipeline using a deep neural network to extract features from 1,553 echocardiography video clips, combined with >100 clinical variables from 156 HCM patients. Patientlevel vectors were reduced using UMAP and clustered using Deep Embedded Clustering (DEC). Cluster quality was assessed using internal validation metrics, and clusters were characterized through statistical comparisons and association rule mining. Results: The cohort included 156 HCM patients (mean age 53.6 +/- 13.9 years, 40.4% female) with preserved systolic function and diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds. The optimal pipeline (DEC with 4 clusters) yielded phenogroups with strong separation (silhouette {approx} 0.89): (A) Advanced Obstructive/Metabolic phenotype; (B) Early-onset, Genotype Positive phenotype; (C) Late-onset, mild non-obstructive phenotype; and (D) Hypertrophic Heart Failure-predominant phenotype. Whilst there was no mortality difference, there was a trend towards increased heart failure and atrial fibrillation burden in the Advanced Obstructive/Metabolic and Heart Failure-predominant subgroups. Conclusions: HCM-PhenotypeNet enabled automated identification of four clinically relevant HCM subgroups. These phenogroups highlight the heterogeneity of HCM and may support personalized risk stratification and management but require validation in larger cohorts. Keywords: Cardiomyopathy Subtypes, Echocardiography, Phenotyping, Video Analysis, Clustering
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Echocardiographic Detection of Mitral Valve Prolapse and Mitral Regurgitation with Video-based Artificial Intelligence Algorithms 96%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 95%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence Methods to Detect Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (AIM-HFpEF) within Electronic Health Records: An equitable disease prediction model 95%
- Right Ventricular Dysfunction: An Overlooked Predictor of Sudden Cardiac Death and Arrhythmic Events -- A Meta-Analysis 92%
- Automated severe aortic stenosis detection on single-view echocardiography: A multi-center deep learning study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- BRAVEHEART: Open-source software for automated electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis 93%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 92%
- In Silico Modeling of Transcatheter Heart Valve Oversizing and Ellipticity, Part II: Effects on Leaflet Mechanics, Hemodynamics, and Stent Deflection Contributing to Thrombogenic Risk and Structural Degeneration 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Algorithm for Predicting Valvular Heart Disease from Heart Sounds in an Unselected Cohort 96%
- Fairness in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Assessing sex and racial bias in deep learning-based segmentation 94%
- Sex-dependent transcriptional control of cardiac electrophysiology by histone acetylation modifiers based on the GTEx database 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.