Back

Modular PEGylation Confers Reduced Immune-Cell Uptake and Enhanced Pharmacokinetic Performance to Encapsulin Protein Nanocages

Ng, Y. W.; Rennie, C.; Boyton, I.; Adrian, H.; Lai, S.; Ariawan, D.; Wich, P.; Tietz, O.; Care, A.

2026-09-17 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.09.12.751196 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Encapsulins are self-assembling prokaryotic protein nanocages with growing potential as systemic drug delivery systems, but their pharmacokinetic behaviour remains poorly characterised, and rapid immune recognition and clearance may limit delivery to target tissues. Here, we show that modular PEGylation of a SpyCatcher-decorated encapsulin Alkaliphilus metalliredigens (Am-S) markedly reduces macrophage uptake and extends systemic circulation. Site-directed surface PEGylation using SpyTagged PEG achieved 82% conjugation efficiency, corresponding to an estimated average of 49 PEG chains per 60 subunit Am-S nanocage, without compromising nanocage assembly, morphology, or colloidal stability. PEGylated Am-S also retained solubility and protein integrity following freeze-thaw cycling and six months of storage. When interacted with RAW 264.7 macrophages in vitro, PEGylation substantially reduced nanocage association and internalisation relative to non-PEGylated nanocages. Following intravenous administration in BALB/c mice, PEGylated nanocages exhibited markedly prolonged circulation, with >50% of the injected dose remaining after 1 h compared with 2.6% for non-PEGylated Am-S, and a circulatory half-life of 1 h 43 min. To our knowledge, this represents the first pharmacokinetic characterisation of an encapsulin nanocage. Together, these findings demonstrate that controlled PEGylation can substantially reduce macrophage interactions and prolong encapsulin circulation in vivo.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.