Back

OpenLipid: a large language model workflow for targeted analysis of DIA mass spectrometry data in lipidomics

Li, J.; Rost, H.

2026-09-18 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.09.12.751192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mass spectrometry has become a central technology for lipidomics, with data-independent acquisition (DIA) enabling broad and reproducible sampling of lipid signals. However, the multiplexed fragment-ion spectra in DIA data complicate lipid identification. Here, we introduce OpenLipid, a large language model (LLM)-based workflow for targeted DIA lipidomics. Using assay libraries built from data-dependent acquisition (DDA) results, OpenLipid directly evaluates extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) from DIA data in a zero-shot setting to identify target lipid peaks and generate human-readable rationales for individual lipid identification decisions. We benchmarked OpenLipid against manual annotations across four datasets comprising human plasma and mouse feces analyzed in positive and negative ionization modes. The plasma assay libraries contained 199 target lipids in positive mode and 147 in negative mode. The fecal assay libraries contained 181 target lipids in positive mode and 264 in negative mode. At a 5% false discovery rate (FDR) threshold, OpenLipid identified 110 (55.3%) and 28 (19.0%) library targets in plasma and 130 (71.8%) and 84 (31.8%) in feces, in positive and negative ionization modes, respectively. OpenLipid achieved an overall identification rate comparable to that of DIAMetAlyzer (57.8%, 19.7%, 89.0%, and 17.8% across the corresponding datasets) and substantially higher than that of untargeted MS-DIAL DIA analysis (12.6%, 0.0%, 47.5%, and 0.0%) on the same assay-library targets. LLM-derived chromatographic features also enabled supervised discrimination between correct and incorrect candidate peak groups for target lipids, with median cross-validation average precision values of 0.838-0.912. Together, these results demonstrate that OpenLipid is an effective LLM-based workflow for FDR-controlled targeted analysis of DIA lipidomics data.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.