VARION: A Network Propagation Framework for Individual Patient Somatic Mutation Interpretation in Cancer Molecular Subtyping
Kwon, T.; Park, Y.-G.; Choi, J.-G.
Show abstract
Accurate molecular subtyping of individual cancer patients from somatic mutation data remains a challenge in precision oncology research. Existing network-based stratification (NBS) methods treat all mutations equivalently, require full-cohort batch processing, and do not demonstrate generalization to independent datasets without retraining. To address this, we present variant interpretation via the adaptive network pRopagatION (VARION), which integrates population-level variant constraint scoring with protein-protein interaction (PPI) network topology. The Adaptive Topology-aware Random Walk with Restart (ATR-RWR) algorithm weights each mutated gene by {varphi}g = {surd}(GIS(g) x {rho}topo(g)), where GIS (Gene Intolerance Score) reflects population-level functional constraint, propagated across a shared PPI network; subtype assignment then uses cosine similarity to TCGA-derived reference centroids, enabling real-time single-patient classification. Across ten TCGA cancer cohorts (n = 2,417), VARION achieved 77.7% accuracy for ovarian cancer (OV), 69.5% for glioblastoma (GBM), 90.2% for cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL), and 75.4% for gastric cancer (STAD). A controlled benchmark applying two alternative clustering methods (PyNBS; a dense autoencoder) to identical ATR-RWR propagation matrices recovered no significant driver enrichment (OR = 1.79 and 1.52, n.s.), versus OR = 144.29 (p = 1.77x10^-12) for VARION, confirming that the GIS-weighted centroid architecture, not propagation alone, drives performance; generalization without retraining was further confirmed in two independent cohorts (ICGC CCA, n = 396; PCAWG, n = 110; OR = {infty}, p < 5x10^-9). Together, these results indicate that VARION's GIS-weighted centroid architecture enables individual-patient molecular subtyping that outperforms existing NBS and graph-learning clustering approaches, with high sensitivity for clinically actionable rare subtypes and robust cross-platform generalization.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning inference of cell type-specific gene expression from breast tumor histopathology 96%
- Real-World Benchmarking and Validation of Foundation Model Transformers for Endometrial Cancer Subtyping from Histopathology 95%
- Image-Based Consensus Molecular Subtyping in Rectal Cancer Biopsies and Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Histology-based Prediction of Therapy Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinomas Using Deep Learning 94%
- Simple Linear Cancer Risk Prediction Models with Novel Features Outperform Complex Approaches 92%
- Machine learning and mechanistic modeling for prediction of metastatic relapse in breast cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge Connector: Decision support system for multiomics-based precision oncology 95%
- Features fusion or not: harnessing multiple pathological foundation models using Meta-Encoder for downstream tasks fine-tuning 95%
- Integrated radiogenomics models predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SpaPheno: Linking Spatial Transcriptomics to Clinical Phenotypes with Interpretable Machine Learning 95%
- Pan-cancer identification of clinically relevant genomic subtypes using outcome-weighted integrative clustering 94%
- Text-mining clinically relevant cancer biomarkers for curation into the CIViC database 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Path2Omics: Enhanced transcriptomic and methylation prediction accuracy from tumor histopathology 97%
- Comprehensive Benchmarking and Integration of Tumour Microenvironment Cell Estimation Methods 93%
- Systematic Establishment of Robustness and Standards in Patient-Derived Xenograft Experiments and Analysis 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.