An explicit birth-death-reticulation model for studying the diversification of phylogenetic networks
May, M. R.; Rothfels, C. l.
Show abstract
Much of the history of life is reticulate and better represented by phylogenetic networks than by strictly bifurcating trees. Understanding the processes that generated that history thus requires models of diversification (speciation and extinction) that incorporate reticulation. However, we currently lack tractable reticulate diversification models. Here we develop a simple birth-death-reticulation model that includes unidirectional and bidirectional gene flow, homoploid hybrid speciation, and allopolyploidization, and derive a practical probability density function for networks under this model. We demonstrate that the model can extract information about reticulation processes from known phylogenetic networks. We also explore the empirical utility of the model using an allopolyploid network of ferns of the family Cystopteridaceae, revealing evidence in favor of the controversial hypothesis that polyploids have lower diversification rates than their diploid relatives. While the model represents an advance in our ability to learn about the diversification of reticulate lineages, we also identify significant statistical, computational, and empirical challenges that face this nascent framework.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- On the effects of selection and mutation on species tree inference 92%
- Partitioned coalescence support reveals biases in species-tree methods and detects gene trees that determine phylogenomic conflicts 92%
- Efficient Identification of Phylogenetically Informative Alignment Sites via Sparse Learning 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.