Back

Cerebrovascular Reactivity to Hypoxic and Hypercapnic Gas Challenges Using 7T BOLD fMRI

LoParco, S.; Miedema, M.; Choi, G.-Y.; Sayeh, M.; Wang, J.; Boudrias, M. H.; Mitsis, G.; Hoge, R.

2026-09-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.09.11.26362747 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is a sensitive marker of vascular health, most commonly measured with BOLD fMRI during hypercapnic gas challenges. Hypoxia is a complementary but under-characterized vasoactive stimulus. We characterize a combined hypercapnic-hypoxic gas-challenge paradigm at 7 Tesla BOLD fMRI and its cross-session reproducibility. Methods. Eleven healthy adults were scanned twice at 7 Tesla during an 18-minute multi-echo, multiband BOLD acquisition, receiving fixed-inspired hypercapnic (5% CO2) and hypoxic (10% O2) gas boluses separated by medical-air recovery periods, with end-tidal gas and peripheral saturation monitoring. Hypercapnic and hypoxic CVR were estimated using three trace-based general linear models: end-tidal gas, peripheral saturation, and Severinghaus-derived arterial saturation; and a finite impulse response model. Cross-session reproducibility was assessed by region-of-interest intraclass correlation. Results. The paradigm produced robust, condition-specific gray-matter BOLD responses that reproduced across sessions. The Severinghaus-derived saturation regressor generalized significantly better than end-tidal and peripheral regressors under cross-session validation and outperformed the finite impulse response benchmark in 58% of gray-matter voxels. Reproducibility across cortical, subcortical, and brainstem atlases was moderate-to-high (median cortical intraclass correlation 0.71). Conclusion. A combined hypercapnic-hypoxic paradigm yields reproducible voxelwise cerebrovascular reactivity maps at 7 Tesla; Severinghaus-derived arterial saturation is the most generalizable regressor for hypoxic reactivity.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.