Caregiver-Rated Inappropriate Speech and Post-cTBS Motor Cortical Facilitation in Autism: A Pilot Biomarker Study
Smith, J. R.; Bonnee, M.; Marler, S.; Atwood, R.; Lewis, B.; Lim, S.; Baldwin, I.; Wu, H.; Liu, J.; Cascio, C.; Joshi, G.; Croarkin, P. R.
Show abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation can provide noninvasive measures of cortical excitability and plasticity, but relationships between these measures and clinically observable features of autism are not fully characterized. Nineteen autistic participants aged 15 to 40 years were included in the analysis of a left primary motor cortex continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) biomarker protocol. Motor evoked potentials were measured at baseline and at seven assessments from 5 to 60 min after stimulation. Linear mixed-effects models evaluated whether clinical measures moderated the post-stimulation motor evoked potential log-response ratio over time. Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC) and Attenuated Behavior Questionnaire (ABQ) analyses were restricted to the same 15 participants with caregiver-informant assessments. Catatonia severity, social impairment, ABQ Motor Total, ABQ Total, and cognitive ability did not significantly moderate the post-stimulation response. ABC Inappropriate Speech was associated with progressively greater post-stimulation facilitation (standardized Time-by-Inappropriate Speech interaction: beta = +0.688, SE = 0.210, 95% CI +0.276 to +1.099; Holm-adjusted P = .008 across eight informant-rated models). Two individual speech-related items ("Talks excessively" and "Talks to self loudly") survived false-discovery-rate correction. An exploratory eight-item ABC phenotype showed a large descriptive in-sample association (beta = +0.904, SE = 0.200, P less than .001) and directionally positive held-out performance. However, full-pipeline permutation tests were nonsignificant for both Pearson (r = .357, two-sided empirical P = .360) and Spearman correlations (rho = .446, two-sided empirical P = .261). Caregiver-rated inappropriate speech may be associated with altered post-cTBS motor cortical facilitation in autism. The candidate phenotype remains hypothesis-generating and requires independent validation.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced inter-subject functional connectivity during movies in autism: Replicability across cross-national fMRI datasets 93%
- Towards robust and replicable sex differences in the intrinsic brain function of autism 92%
- Behavioral effects of multiple-dose oxytocin treatment in autism: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cannabidiol treatment is associated with broadband spectral electrophysiological changes and improved cognition in boys with low-functioning autism spectrum disorder 93%
- A Simultaneous Raclopride Positron Emission Tomography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Striatal Dopamine Binding in Autism 92%
- Age-dependent cortical overconnectivity revers under anesthesia in Shank3 mice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Change in aperiodic activity over first year of life is associated with later autism diagnosis and 18-month language development in infants with family history of autism 94%
- Intact Somatosensory Temporal Sensitivity in Adults on the Autism Spectrum: A High-Density Electrophysiological Mapping Study Using the Mismatch Negativity (MMN) Sensory Memory Paradigm. 92%
- Increased context adjustment is associated with auditory sensitivities but not with autistic traits 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural oscillatory dynamics reveal altered top-down and integrative mechanisms during face processing in autistic children and unaffected siblings of autistic children 93%
- Prediction of autism spectrum disorder diagnosis using nonlinear measures of language-related EEG at 6 and 12 months 92%
- Reduced Lateralization of Multiple Functional Brain Networks in Autistic Males 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.