Effectiveness and safety of a New Standardised TrEatment Protocol based on initial/early therapy with single-pill combinations of blood pressure-lowering drugs for improving blood pressure control (NewSTeP): Rationale, design of a randomized clinical trial and baseline characteristics of the trial participants
Dhurjati, R.; Pant, R.; Kumar, A.; Mittal, A.; Chappidi, K.; Satheesh, G.; Puri, P.; Tiruttani, S. K.; Rajaram, S.; Basheer, A.; kaur, P.; Moran, A.; Rosende, A.; Subramani, P.; Mahajan, S.; Lalvani, N.; Bansal, S.; Prabhakaran, D.; Balagopalan, J. P.; Jan, S.; Huffman, M. D.; Jha, V.; Salam, A.
Show abstract
Background Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Despite availability of blood pressure (BP)-lowering therapies, BP control rates remain suboptimal. Reluctance to initiate treatment with combination therapy and delayed treatment intensification contribute to poor control. Early use of single-pill combinations (SPCs) within standardised treatment protocols (STPs) may improve outcomes, but evidence from India is limited. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a new STP incorporating initial or early use of SPCs compared with usual care among adults with hypertension. Methods The New Standardised TrEatment Protocol (NewSTeP) trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial conducted in tertiary healthcare centres in India. Adults with hypertension who are untreated or receiving one BP-lowering drug and require treatment initiation or intensification (n = 300) will be randomized 1:1 to either a new STP incorporating early SPC therapy or usual care. Participants will be followed for 6 months. The primary effectiveness outcome is change in home-measured mean systolic BP from randomization to month 6. The primary safety outcome is discontinuation of trial drug due to adverse events. Secondary outcomes include proportion of participants achieving BP control, change in diastolic BP, incidence of adverse events of special interest, treatment adherence, treatment modification, and time to BP control. A process evaluation will assess reach, implementation, acceptability, and sustainability, while an economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Results Between October 2025 and March 2026, 300 participants were randomized across nine sites (150 to New STP; 150 usual care) from 360 screened individuals. Final follow-up is expected in September 2026, with results anticipated in October 2026. Conclusions The NewSTeP trial will provide evidence on the effectiveness, safety, implementation, and cost-effectiveness of an SPC-based STP for hypertension management in India and inform future hypertension control strategies and policies.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of a community-based intervention for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in two rural populations in Kenya and The Gambia: IMPLEMENT-IHCoR Feasibility Study Protocol 95%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 94%
- Telehealth versus Self-Directed Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Blood Pressure: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attrition and associated factors among patients on chronic antihypertensive therapy at Mulago hospital, Uganda: A mixed method study 95%
- Patterns of Adherence to Home BP Monitoring in the e-Framingham Heart Study 95%
- Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk Charts among Hypertensive Adults Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in West Africa Sub-region 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 96%
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: An analysis of monthly changes in Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators in OpenSAFELY 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of leveraging existing HIV primary health systems and community health workers for hypertension screening and treatment in Africa: an individual-based modelling study 91%
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 90%
- Taxation of foods high in fat, sugar, and sodium in India: A modelling study of health and economic impacts 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Control, Fludrocortisone or Midodrine for the treatment of Orthostatic Hypotension (CONFORM-OH): Results from an internal pilot randomised controlled trial 92%
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 92%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.