Acceptability of AI-applications in routine clinical care for children and adolescents: perspectives of parents and healthcare professionals
Lin, F.; Bischops, A. C.; Kerth, J.-L.; Meissner, T.; Bruni, T.; Eickhoff, S. B.; Heinrichs, B.; Lahnakoskia, J. M.; Dukart, J.
Show abstract
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, growing interest has emerged in its potential application in pediatric healthcare. Understanding the factors influencing AI acceptability among parents and clinical staff is an important prerequisite for facilitating its integration in clinical routine. To date, these factors have not been systematically assessed across different stakeholder groups. Here we investigated AI acceptability among parents (first cohort n = 198; second cohort: n = 79) and pediatric health care professionals (n = 33) across different disease, diagnosis or treatment scenarios. The effects of demographic variables and contextual predictors, such as data privacy, AI knowledge and perceived disease severity, on willingness to use AI were evaluated. More liberal data privacy was associated with reduced willingness to use AI (p = < .001). A higher perceived disease severity was linked to higher willingness to use AI ({beta} = .10, p = .013) in the second parent group. When the recommendations of AI and clinicians conflicted, parents were more likely to choose AI over the judgment of clinicians in treatment compared to diagnosis scenarios. Healthcare professionals showed similar patterns but additionally weighted perceived disease severity when resolving disagreements. These findings highlight the importance of addressing stakeholder concerns regarding disease specific customization, accuracy, data privacy and accountability when introducing AI into pediatric healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Uploads of Health Data in the Electronic Health Record - The Role of Framing and Length of Privacy Information 92%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 91%
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning for Paediatric Related Decision Support in Emergency Care - A UK and Ireland Network Survey Study 95%
- Developing and validating an explainable digital mortality prediction tool for extremely preterm infants 92%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying clinical skill gaps of healthcare workers using a digital clinical decision support algorithm during outpatient pediatric consultations in primary health centers in Rwanda 91%
- US Primary Care in 2029: A Delphi Survey on the Impact of Machine Learning 91%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 90%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 90%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 93%
- Development and Evaluation of MADDIE: Method to Acquire Delivery Date Information from Electronic Health Records 92%
- Digital applications to support self-management of multimorbidity: A scoping review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.