Back

PRISM: Phase-Resolved Isotropic Subtraction Mapping for Automated Multi-Phase CT Digital Subtraction Angiography

Rodriguez, R.; Ramirez, R.; Rathore, H.

2026-09-13 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.09.10.26362169 medRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) characterization, yet clinical interpretation relies on subjective visual comparison across phases. We present PRISM (Phase-Resolved Isotropic Subtraction Mapping), an open-source automated pipeline that transforms multi-phase CT acquisitions into registered digital subtraction angiography (DSA) volumes with color-coded enhancement maps. PRISM integrates six sequential processing stages: (1) DICOM loading with automated contrast-phase classification, (2) deep learning-based isotropic interpolation via RIFE, (3) automated kidney segmentation using TotalSegmentator v2, (4) enhancement-based tissue detection, (5) three-step deformable registration (rigid, affine, B-spline) using SimpleITK, and (6) dual-channel digital subtraction visualization. We present a systematic parameter optimization study comprising 200 registrations across five patients and five experiments. Key findings: We identify an efficient registration configuration combining a 40 mm B-spline grid (within 6% of the 30 mm quality optimum at 36% lower computational cost), 5% metric sampling (equivalent quality to 25% at 3.2x speedup), and a single-level multi-resolution pyramid (avoiding the 5.4x overhead of a 4,2 pyramid with no quality benefit); we show that registration quality is effectively independent of interpolation target spacing from 0.5-3.0 mm, enabling a coarse-register/fine-apply strategy that computes the full transform at 3.0 mm (approximately 4 minutes per phase) and applies it to 0.5 mm volumes for high-resolution visualization. We also determine that a 40 HU subtraction noise threshold optimally balances signal-to-noise ratio (2.00) against sensitivity (14.2% enhancing volume retained), with higher thresholds (60-80 HU) favoring specificity and lower thresholds (20 HU) favoring sensitivity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.