PRISM: Phase-Resolved Isotropic Subtraction Mapping for Automated Multi-Phase CT Digital Subtraction Angiography
Rodriguez, R.; Ramirez, R.; Rathore, H.
Show abstract
Multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) characterization, yet clinical interpretation relies on subjective visual comparison across phases. We present PRISM (Phase-Resolved Isotropic Subtraction Mapping), an open-source automated pipeline that transforms multi-phase CT acquisitions into registered digital subtraction angiography (DSA) volumes with color-coded enhancement maps. PRISM integrates six sequential processing stages: (1) DICOM loading with automated contrast-phase classification, (2) deep learning-based isotropic interpolation via RIFE, (3) automated kidney segmentation using TotalSegmentator v2, (4) enhancement-based tissue detection, (5) three-step deformable registration (rigid, affine, B-spline) using SimpleITK, and (6) dual-channel digital subtraction visualization. We present a systematic parameter optimization study comprising 200 registrations across five patients and five experiments. Key findings: We identify an efficient registration configuration combining a 40 mm B-spline grid (within 6% of the 30 mm quality optimum at 36% lower computational cost), 5% metric sampling (equivalent quality to 25% at 3.2x speedup), and a single-level multi-resolution pyramid (avoiding the 5.4x overhead of a 4,2 pyramid with no quality benefit); we show that registration quality is effectively independent of interpolation target spacing from 0.5-3.0 mm, enabling a coarse-register/fine-apply strategy that computes the full transform at 3.0 mm (approximately 4 minutes per phase) and applies it to 0.5 mm volumes for high-resolution visualization. We also determine that a 40 HU subtraction noise threshold optimally balances signal-to-noise ratio (2.00) against sensitivity (14.2% enhancing volume retained), with higher thresholds (60-80 HU) favoring specificity and lower thresholds (20 HU) favoring sensitivity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AngioNet: A Convolutional Neural Network for Vessel Segmentation in X-ray Angiography 93%
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 92%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 92%
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 92%
- A deep learning algorithm using CT images to screen for Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 92%
- Photon-counting cine-cardiac CT in the mouse 92%
- pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An Ensembled Deep Learning Model Outperforms Human Experts in Diagnosing Biliary Atresia from Sonographic Gallbladder Images 92%
- Clinically Applicable Deep Learning for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in Computed Tomography Angiography Images: A Comprehensive Multicohort Study 91%
- Weakly supervised classification of rare aortic valve malformations using unlabeled cardiac MRI sequences 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.