Joint loading in the presence of torsional deformities is overestimated unless gait adaptations are considered: a predictive simulation approach
Haralabidis, N.; Passmore, E.; Carty, C.; De Pieri, E.; Rutz, E.; Modenese, L.
Show abstract
Lower-limb torsional deformities have been shown to alter joint loading, although the findings vary between studies perhaps due to the simulation approaches applied. This study used predictive simulations to investigate how femoral neck anteversion (FNA) and external tibial torsion (ETT) influence hip and knee joint loading. Musculoskeletal models with altered FNA (1{degrees}-48{degrees}) and ETT (12{degrees}-53{degrees}), in isolation and combination, were created from a scaled adult model, and predictive walking (speed: 1.33 m/s) simulations were generated. Predictive simulations reproduced adaptations in hip rotation and foot-progression angle reported in individuals with torsional deformities. Hip and knee compressive, shear, and resultant contact forces were estimated, and multiple linear regressions quantified the independent associations of FNA and ETT with each outcome. Regressions accounted for 23%-86% of the variance in hip loading and 5%-87% in knee loading. FNA generally made the largest relative contribution to the variance explained in joint loading across regression models, although its associations varied in direction. Each 10{degrees} increase in FNA reduced the first hip compressive and resultant peaks by 0.076 and 0.035 BW, respectively, while hip shear force showed the largest increase, averaging 0.055 BW across both peaks. Most knee loads also increased, by up to 0.131 BW for the second resultant peak. Associations with ETT were primarily observed at the second peak. Our findings suggest that considering gait adaptations due to torsional alterations is crucial for estimating lower-limb joint loading, and prescribing joint kinematics and external forces while altering lower-limb torsion might lead to overestimation.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Does the margin of stability measure predict stability of gait with a constrained base of support? 97%
- The effect of anteroposterior perturbations on the control of the center of mass during treadmill walking 96%
- Trunk Control during Gait: Walking with Wide and Narrow Step Widths Present Distinct Challenges 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Discover Your Potential: The Influence of Kinematics on a Muscle's Ability to Contribute to the Sit-to-Stand Transfer 96%
- Effects of additional load at different heights on gait initiation: a statistical parametric mapping of center of pressure and center of mass behavior 96%
- Biomechanical effects of adding an articulating toe joint to a passive foot prosthesis for incline and decline walking 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gait Adaptations in Step Length and Push-off Force during Walking with Functional Asymmetry 96%
- Minimization of metabolic cost of transport predicts changes in gait mechanics over a range of ankle-foot orthosis stiffnesses in individuals with bilateral plantar flexor weakness 96%
- How Well Do Commonly Used Co-Contraction Indices Approximate Lower Limb Joint Stiffness Trends during Gait? 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transfemoral limb loss modestly increases the metabolic cost of optimal control simulations of walking 95%
- The energetic effect of hip flexion and retraction in walking at different speeds: a modeling study 94%
- Geometric variation of the human tibia-fibula: A public dataset of tibia-fibula surface meshes and statistical shape model 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Muscle Metabolic Energy Costs While Modifying Propulsive Force Generation During Walking 94%
- Developing Commotio Cordis Injury Metrics by Correlating Chest Force and Rib Deformation to Left Ventricle Strain and Pressure 92%
- A Mesoscale Finite Element Modelling Approach for Understanding Brain Morphology and Material Heterogeneity Effects in Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.