Back

Omitting end preparation reduces index misassignment in Nanopore-based DNA metabarcoding: application to a decadal coastal time series in the Sea of Okhotsk

Endo, M.; Nagai, S.; Watanabe, T.; Kurita, N.; Asakawa, S.; Yoshitake, K.

2026-09-10 ecology
10.64898/2026.09.08.750005 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding enables sensitive, non-invasive assessment of fish communities, but highly multiplexed analyses using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) platforms require stringent control of sample-index misassignment and sequencing errors. We developed a MiFish experimental workflow combining unique dual indexes, a library protocol that omitted end preparation and used 5'-phosphorylated primers, BLAST-based demultiplexing, quality-dependent clustering, consensus generation, and haplotype partitioning by SNP/INDEL patterns. Omitting pooled end-prep reduced the mean index-chimera rate from 0.0674% to 0.000420%, a 160-fold reduction. We applied the workflow to an archive of seawater samples collected weekly off Monbetsu, Hokkaido, Japan, from 2012 to 2022. Relative read abundance (RRA) data were obtained for 274 samples, and eight taxa showed significant seasonality. For six of these taxa, the three-year mean RRA peaks coincided with reported spawning periods in Hokkaido. The workflow substantially reduced index misassignment and enabled cost-efficient, highly multiplexed analysis of a decadal fish eDNA time series.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Ecology Resources
○ 171 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Environmental DNA
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Metabarcoding and Metagenomics
● 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
7
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
○ 176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
8
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
Journal of Fish Biology
○ 17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
○ 69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Frontiers in Marine Science
○ 62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
12
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
● 64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
14
Water Research
○ 79 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
Scientific Data
○ 209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Communications Earth & Environment
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
17
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
19
ISME Communications
◐ 120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%
22
FACETS
● 14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
23
BMC Genomics
○ 406 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
24
Global Change Biology
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.