Gender Differences in Treatment Burden and Care Sustainability Among Adults Living With Diabetes
Al Zahidy, M.; Rivadeneira, F. D.; Rabeaa, O. M.; Shah, B. N.; Branda, M. E.; Brito, J. P.; Montori, V. M.
Show abstract
Objective Women carry disproportionate shares of caregiving and other life demands that may compound the work of diabetes self-management. We sought to examine gender differences in overall and digital treatment burden and their key contributors. Research Design and Methods Cross-sectional analysis of two cohorts of adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes attending outpatient endocrinology visits who completed the Treatment Burden Questionnaire Plus Digital (TBQ+D) (n=472). Multivariable regression estimated gender differences in overall and digital treatment burden, ability to live a normal life, and sustainability of current self-care effort, adjusting for age, diabetes type, insulin intensity, HbA1c, and cohort. Item-level analyses identified contributors to observed differences. Results Compared to men, women reported higher median overall treatment burden (33 vs 20, adjusted mean difference 10.6 points, 95% CI 5.1-16.3; p<.0001) and digital treatment burden (13 vs 7, adjusted mean difference 3.5 points, 95% CI 1.1-6.1; p=.009). They also had higher odds of not living a normal life (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.18-2.67; p=.006) and difficulty sustaining current self-care efforts indefinitely (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.10-3.66; p=.023). Digital burden differences were concentrated in annoyance, precautions, and time and effort required to use digital medicine tools, whereas contributors to differences in overall burden varied, with relationships, self-monitoring, and injections contributing most. Conclusions After adjusting for treatment intensity and other factors, women living with diabetes were twice as likely to be overwhelmed by diabetes care than men. Their greater vulnerability to treatment burden demands healthcare service redesign and individualization of plans of care that minimally disrupt patients' and caregivers' lives.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring support needs of people living with diabetes during the coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic: insights from a UK survey 95%
- Insulin pricing and other major diabetes-related concerns in the USA: A study of 46,407 Tweets between 2017 and 2019 93%
- The use of a participatory patient engagement research project to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Michigan men’s diabetes project II: protocol for peer-led diabetes self-management education and long-term support in Black men 92%
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 92%
- Telehealth during and beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Licensed Dietitians in an Emerging Economy 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Home monitoring of HbA1c in diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis on reliability, accuracy, and patient acceptability 91%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 89%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 92%
- Determining the feasibility of calculating pancreatic cancer risk scores for people with new-onset diabetes in primary care (DEFEND PRIME): study protocol 91%
- An mHealth app using machine learning to increase physical activity in diabetes and depression: clinical trial protocol for the DIAMANTE Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.