Stoichiometric Aquatic Food-Web Models Coupling Pelagic and Benthic Zones
Ramirez, R.
Show abstract
Ecological stoichiometry allows us to investigate how food quality affects food-web population dynamics. We consider periphyton, phytoplankton, and a shared Daphnia consumer in a closed system with separate benthic and pelagic phosphate pools. The producers have variable phosphorus-to-carbon ratios, while the consumer maintains a constant ratio. We construct the model, establish boundedness under stated conditions, characterize its grazer-free equilibrium families and their local spectra, derive conditions for positive consumer growth, and examine its numerical bifurcation structure as light-dependent carrying capacity varies. The bifurcation diagrams contain stable and unstable equilibrium branches together with a stable periodic family, revealing a more complex response to light enrichment than a single sequence of steady states and oscillations. A descending consumer equilibrium branch illustrates that greater light availability need not increase consumer biomass. We then introduce periodically varying carrying capacities and compare weak and strong seasonal forcing. Stronger forcing produces brief consumer rebounds in the high-light example, although the peaks diminish over the displayed interval. Together, the growth conditions and branch diagrams provide a framework for interpreting population dynamics in terms of food quantity and food quality. Independent numerical continuation identifies a Hopf crossing and a fold; the termination mechanism of the periodic branch remains unresolved.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Species dynamics and interactions via metabolically informed consumer-resource models 96%
- Local control of resource allocation is sufficient to model optimal dynamics in syntrophic systems 96%
- Persistence and stability of interacting species in response to climate warming: The role of trophic structure 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.