Advancing long-read metagenomic binning via single-copy-gene guided contrastive learning
Han, H.; Messer, L. F.; Quince, C.; Bending, G. D.; Raguideau, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, S.
Show abstract
Long-read sequencing advances metagenomics by producing highly contiguous assemblies and more complete metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). However, current long-read metagenomic binners fail to incorporate the rich information of long-read assemblies into representation learning and exhibit limited performance on complex datasets. Here, we show that a higher proportion of long-read assembled contigs contain single-copy genes (SCGs) and more SCGs per contig. Therefore, we developed SCGBinner, which leverages SCG-guided contrastive learning to exploit the advantage of long-read data for learning high-quality contig embeddings. SCGBinner consistently outperforms other binning methods across five simulated and seven real-world long-read datasets, especially on real-world high-diversity samples. For a deep agricultural soil metagenome, SCGBinner recovered 71% more high-quality MAGs and 38% more near-complete MAGs than the second-best method. Notably, SCGBinner uniquely recovered 449 novel high-quality species, which shed light on the predicted ecological roles of 65 uncharacterised families and 93 novel genera. Overall, SCGBinner could harness the potential of long-read sequencing to provide unprecedented insights into the microbial dark matter of complex microbial communities.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High-quality metagenome assembly from nanopore reads with nanoMDBG 94%
- Systematic evaluation of metatranscriptomic differential gene expression in silico, in vitro, and in vivo enables elucidation of inter-species cross-feeding 94%
- Integrating theory and machine learning to reveal determinants of plasmid copy number 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.