Back

In Vivo K-edge Imaging on a Clinical Dual-source PCCT: Feasibility of Gadolinium Applications in a Porcine Model

Rybertt, M. V.; Liu, L. P.; Sahbaee, P.; McClung, G.; Mathew, M.; Noël, P. B.; Dhanaliwala, A. H.

2026-09-09 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.09.07.26362472 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of in vivo gadolinium K-edge imaging on a clinical dual-source photon-counting CT (PCCT) system in a porcine model and to assess its performance for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, functional biliary imaging, and dual-contrast (bi-phasic) imaging. Materials and Methods: A single healthy Yorkshire-Landrace pig was imaged on a clinical dual-source PCCT system (140 kVp; energy thresholds 20/55/72/90 keV; CTDIvol 12 mGy). Gadolinium K edge material-specific maps were generated with a calibration-based least-squares material decomposition. Three imaging protocols were evaluated for feasibility: (A) contrast dose testing for dynamic imaging with a hepatobiliary-clearing gadolinium contrast agent (0.2 and 0.8 mL/kg); (B) functional biliary imaging with dynamic and delayed acquisitions; and (C) dual-contrast imaging with simultaneous iodine and gadolinium decomposition. Attenuation (HU) and material concentrations (mg/mL) were measured from regions of interest. Results: Gadolinium was quantifiable in material-specific maps at a contrast dose of 0.8 mL/kg (arterial aortic signal, 114 {+/-} 4 HU and 1.4 {+/-} 0.3 mg/mL; delayed bile duct, 111 {+/-} 4 HU and 4.3 {+/-} 0.4 mg/mL). Hepatobiliary excretion was tracked over time, with bile duct gadolinium plateauing near 3.3 mg/mL approximately 15 minutes after injection. In the dual contrast acquisition, arterial gadolinium (2.5 {+/-} 0.7 mg/mL) and portal venous iodine (1.9 {+/-} 0.7 mg/mL) were separated within the liver, and both agents were separated within the ureters. Conclusions: In this proof of concept, gadolinium K-edge imaging was feasible on a clinical dual-source PCCT system for dynamic, functional biliary, and dual-contrast applications, supporting further development with improved material-decomposition sensitivity and confirmation in larger studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.