Empirically calibrated allele frequency thresholds for ACMG BA1, BS1 and PM2 evidence criteria
Dubey, V.; Eisenhart, C. E.
Show abstract
Allele frequency (AF) is among the most frequently applied lines of evidence in variant classification, yet the ACMG/AMP criteria that use it (BA1, BS1, PM2) are still applied at fixed defaults while computational predictors have been systematically recalibrated. Population frequencies are shaped by selection, ascertainment, and gene-level demography at once, and few genes carry enough classified variants to set a threshold directly. Extending the calibration approach applied to computational predictors, we used inheritance mode and gene-level missense constraint as stratification axes and pooled variants within each stratum. ClinVar missense variants annotated against gnomAD v4.1.1 were stratified along both, and gene-normalized kernel density estimates were fit to pathogenic and benign variants within a sliding window along the constraint axis. Thresholds were placed where the likelihood ratio crossed ACMG/AMP evidence strengths at a prior of 0.0441. Derived thresholds varied systematically with constraint and differed between inheritance modes, departing from the fixed defaults in both directions. On held-out genes, stratified cutoffs reached 96.7% accuracy against 90.1% unstratified. Restricted to the 73 ClinGen expert panel genes with autosomal dominant or recessive inheritance, the derived cutoffs reached 91.0% accuracy at 69.5% variant coverage, against 88.8% accuracy at 86.2% coverage for the panel-specified cutoffs. AF thresholds for these criteria are not constant across genes, and inheritance mode and missense constraint capture much of that variation. The resulting cutoffs are empirically derived, carry explicit uncertainty, and deploy as a lookup table across thousands of genes no expert panel currently covers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting and calibrating evidence of variant pathogenicity from population biobank data 95%
- Availability of benign missense variant “truthsets” for validation of functional assays: current status and a novel systematic approach 94%
- Bayesian model comparison for rare variant association studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Informing Variant Assessment using Structured Evidence from Prior Classifications (PS1, PM5, and PVS1 Sequence Variant Interpretation Criteria) 95%
- Accurate assignment of disease liability to genetic variants using only population data 93%
- A gene pathogenicity tool 'GenePy' identifies missed biallelic diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide prediction of pathogenic gain- and loss-of-function variants from ensemble learning of diverse feature set 95%
- COBT: A gene-based rare variant burden test for case-only study designs using aggregated genotypes from public reference cohorts. 95%
- A systematic analysis of splicing variants identifies new diagnoses in the 100,000 Genomes Project. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Diverse ancestral representation improves genetic intolerance metrics 94%
- DeMAG predicts the effects of variants in clinically actionable genes by integrating structural and evolutionary epistatic features 94%
- Calibrated rare variant genetic risk scores for complex disease prediction using large exome sequence repositories 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.