Monitoring Emergency Medical Services Frequent Use: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study Using Routinely-Collected Data
Maruster, L.; van der Zee, D.-J.; Dercksen, B.
Show abstract
Introduction Aging populations are placing increasing pressure on Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers to address the potentially suboptimal use of scarce resources. EMS utilization that falls outside the established deployment framework, referred to here as non-indicated use, may constitute an important source of such suboptimal resource use. Frequent users of EMS represent a key target group in efforts to reduce non-indicated utilization. The focus on frequent users is driven by the substantial workload and costs associated with their use of EMS, as well as by the need to address potential underlying quality-of-care issues reflected in high, persistent, or intensive EMS utilization. Addressing possible non-indicated EMS use among frequent users requires the development of monitoring systems that can be applied in both clinical practice and research to identify such use and support appropriate action once it has been detected. This study aims to explore the relationships between the drivers of frequent EMS use, potential remedies for non-indicated use, and subsequent reductions in utilization. Based on these insights, the study seeks to develop, through prototyping, a framework to guide the design of monitoring systems for research and clinical practice. Methods and analysis We will employ a mixed-methods observational study design. A systematic literature review and interviews with stakeholders who play key roles in the EMS referral process will be conducted to identify the drivers of frequent use and non-indicated EMS use and their potential remedies. Pseudonymized routinely collected data covering 2013-2026 from three Dutch EMS providers will be analyzed using machine learning (ML) and artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques to develop a typology of drivers and trustworthy, interpretable models for identifying frequent use and non-indicated use. A prototype monitoring system will be developed to demonstrate the online and the offline functionalities of the proposed framework for use in both clinical practice and research. The prototype usability, trustworthiness, and interpretability will be evaluated in collaboration with relevant stakeholders involved in the EMS referral process. Ethics and dissemination The data is routinely collected for administrative purposes only. Accordingly, the data will be completely pseudonymized, and as such this study falls outside the scope of the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act. After assessment we obtained a full waiver for using pseudonymized data from the EMS services from the Medical Ethics Review Board of the University Medical Center Groningen (reference number METc 2022/053). Patients and/or the public are not involved in the design, conduct, reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Interviewees and participants in evaluating prototype monitoring systems (e.g. EMS clinicians, medical directors, ambulance nurses, emergency physicians, general practitioners (GPs), policy makers and police officers) will provide informed verbal consent prior to their participation in the study. The study findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, presentations at conferences, and in social media. Also, summary reports will be made available to participating institutions and relevant stakeholders.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of the National Early Warning Score version 2 (NEWS2) in predicting need for time-critical treatment: Retrospective observational cohort study 93%
- Emergency medicine patient wait time multivariable prediction models: a multicentre derivation and validation study 92%
- Variation in ambulance pre-alert process and practice: Cross-sectional survey of ambulance clinicians 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 93%
- Development of the AD F ICE_IT clinical decision support system to assist deprescribing of fall-risk increasing drugs: A user-centered design approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trans-sectoral patient pathways in urgent and emergency care: a Study Protocol for a prospective mixed-methods study in Germany (TRANSPARENT Study) 93%
- Medication errors during simulated paediatric resuscitations: a prospective, observational human reliability analysis 93%
- Development of a resilience assessment tool for cardiac care pathways in Europe: A mixed-methods study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Homeless Population Needs in the Emergency Department Using Community-Based Participatory Research 91%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 91%
- Predictive accuracy of computer-aided versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 93%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 91%
- Nowcasting and Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and Healthcare Demand In Turkey, A Modelling Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.