Back

Mental health before, during, and after COVID-19 (through 2025) in boys, girls, and gender-diverse youth

Kiviruusu, O.; Therman, S.; Lehtonen, J.; Ystrom, E.; Butwicka, A.; Halldorsdottir, T.; Ask, H.; Suvisaari, J.

2026-09-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.06.26362161 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Adolescent mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic has been a major public health concern. Studies covering the post-pandemic period remain scarce and rarely include gender-diverse youth. We examined trends in mental health among cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary youth during the pandemic and through 2025. Methods Participants (N=636,201) were adolescents in grades 8-11 from the Finnish School Health Promotion study between 2019 and 2025, a repeated cross-sectional classroom survey. Validated questionnaires were used to assess clinical levels of depressive, generalized anxiety and social anxiety symptoms, as well as mental well-being. Results In 2025 there were 81,145 (48.6%) cisgender girls, 1137 (0.7%) transgender boys, 78,898 (47.2%) cisgender boys, 449 (0.3%) transgender girls, and 4658 (2.8%) nonbinary youth. Clinically significant depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms remained more prevalent in 2025 (reference) compared with pre-pandemic levels across all groups (ORs for 2019, 0.48-0.86; p<0.01). Compared with other groups, symptoms were most prevalent among transgender boys and nonbinary youth. Among cisgender youth, generalized anxiety symptoms increased across the post-pandemic period (ORs for 2021 and 2023, 0.81-0.95; p<0.0001). Nonbinary youth were the only group to show a recovery pattern in depressive, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms (ORs for 2021, 1.36-1.52; p<00001) and demonstrated improved mental well-being after the pandemic (beta for 2021, -0.68; p<0.0001). Conclusions The results indicate that the elevated levels of mental health problems among adolescents associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have not subsided. They also reveal persistent disparities by gender identity and call for targeted policy action.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.