Mental health before, during, and after COVID-19 (through 2025) in boys, girls, and gender-diverse youth
Kiviruusu, O.; Therman, S.; Lehtonen, J.; Ystrom, E.; Butwicka, A.; Halldorsdottir, T.; Ask, H.; Suvisaari, J.
Show abstract
Background Adolescent mental health after the COVID-19 pandemic has been a major public health concern. Studies covering the post-pandemic period remain scarce and rarely include gender-diverse youth. We examined trends in mental health among cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary youth during the pandemic and through 2025. Methods Participants (N=636,201) were adolescents in grades 8-11 from the Finnish School Health Promotion study between 2019 and 2025, a repeated cross-sectional classroom survey. Validated questionnaires were used to assess clinical levels of depressive, generalized anxiety and social anxiety symptoms, as well as mental well-being. Results In 2025 there were 81,145 (48.6%) cisgender girls, 1137 (0.7%) transgender boys, 78,898 (47.2%) cisgender boys, 449 (0.3%) transgender girls, and 4658 (2.8%) nonbinary youth. Clinically significant depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms remained more prevalent in 2025 (reference) compared with pre-pandemic levels across all groups (ORs for 2019, 0.48-0.86; p<0.01). Compared with other groups, symptoms were most prevalent among transgender boys and nonbinary youth. Among cisgender youth, generalized anxiety symptoms increased across the post-pandemic period (ORs for 2021 and 2023, 0.81-0.95; p<0.0001). Nonbinary youth were the only group to show a recovery pattern in depressive, generalized anxiety, and social anxiety symptoms (ORs for 2021, 1.36-1.52; p<00001) and demonstrated improved mental well-being after the pandemic (beta for 2021, -0.68; p<0.0001). Conclusions The results indicate that the elevated levels of mental health problems among adolescents associated with the COVID-19 pandemic have not subsided. They also reveal persistent disparities by gender identity and call for targeted policy action.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents 94%
- Internalizing Problems Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Dutch Children and Adolescents with and without Pre-Existing Mental Health Problems 93%
- Understanding priorities and needs for child and adolescent mental health in Greece from multiple informants: an open resource 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: a conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study 95%
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 94%
- School bullying and its association with psychological wellbeing: findings of the Fujian Adolescent Mental Wellness Study (FAMWeS) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental and social health of children and adolescents with pre-existing mental or somatic problems during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown 93%
- Mental Health Impact of COVID-19: A global study of risk and resilience factors 93%
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental Health Conditions in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Asexual Youth in Brazil: a call for action 94%
- Frequency of Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation Among University Students Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- The association between academic pressure and adolescent mental health problems: A systematic review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 93%
- Social inequalities in youth mental health in Canada, 2007-2022: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study 92%
- Social isolation in mid-life: associations with psychological distress, life satisfaction and self-rated health in two successive British birth cohorts 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.