Scoring Rubric to Assess Ethical Issues in Clinical Artificial Intelligence Tools
Kindler, K.; Visweswaran, S.; Wang, Y.; Abad, J.; Maier, J.; Kravchenko, O. V.
Show abstract
With the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in clinical care, it is essential to assess ethical issues related to using these tools, both before and after deployment. To address this need, a multidisciplinary team of clinical and AI experts developed and tested a scoring rubric to evaluate AI tools in clinical settings from an ethical perspective, considering potential issues that may arise during their use. The rubric provides a replicable scoring system comprising five content areas and four scoring categories. The content areas include evaluation population, accessibility, clinical bias, user control, and monitoring and updates. To test the applicability of the rubric, we applied it to three AI tools designed for clinical decision-making, clinical documentation, and clinical image analysis. The evaluation relied solely on publicly available information to simulate typical clinical settings. The rubric addresses a critical gap in the evaluation and governance of clinical AI tools by providing a structured framework to assess their ethical aspects. This approach enables healthcare systems to address and monitor the ethical impact of AI tools, fostering greater trust among clinicians and patients and guiding improvements in clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethical Alignment of LLMs in Healthcare: Does GPT-o1 Adopt a Deontological or Utilitarian Approach? 94%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 92%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiology Knowledge Assessment of Retrieval-Augmented Open versus Proprietary Large Language Models 94%
- Harnessing the Open Access Version of ChatGPT for Enhanced Clinical Opinions 93%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential for digital patient symptom recording through symptom assessment applications to optimize patient flow and reduce waiting times in Urgent Care Centers: a simulation study 91%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 91%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opening the Black Box of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support: A Study Predicting Stroke Outcome 93%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 93%
- A method for rapid machine learning development for data mining with Doctor-In-The-Loop 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.