Multidimensional T1-T2 Relaxation Imaging In Vivo on a Portable 0.064~T MRI Scanner
Wilczynski, E.; Najmudeen Magdoom, K.; Avram, A. V.; Williamson, N. H.; Benjamini, D.; Horovitz, S. G.; Basser, P. J.
Show abstract
Purpose: To demonstrate the feasibility of whole-brain multidimensional T1-T2 relaxation imaging on a portable 0.064 T MRI scanner. Methods: A two-dimensional inversion-recovery, fast spin-echo acquisition was used to jointly encode T1 and T2 relaxation. Joint relaxation distributions were reconstructed voxel-wise using marginal-distribution constrained optimization (MADCO). The approach was evaluated in a quantitative relaxation MRI phantom and subsequently applied in vivo in a healthy volunteer. Joint distributions, marginal distributions, distribution-derived measures, and statistical dependencies between the two relaxation dimensions were examined. Results: Phantom joint relaxation estimates showed good overall agreement with mono-exponential relaxation measurements and previously reported values at 0.064 T. The in vivo acquisition provided whole-brain coverage over a broad range of relaxation weightings and tissue contrasts. Reconstructed joint T1-T2 distributions showed spatially organized features across the relaxation space, including broad and overlapping relaxation components that were not fully represented by single-value relaxation maps or by either 1D marginal distribution alone. Selected regions of the joint relaxation space produced component maps with distinct spatial patterns. Statistical analysis further showed a dependence between the two relaxation dimensions, supporting the presence of added information in the joint distribution that is lost when treating T1 and T2 separately. Conclusion: Whole-brain multidimensional T1-T2 relaxation imaging is clinically feasible on a portable 0.064 T MRI scanner. Joint relaxation distributions provide information beyond single-value relaxation mapping and may support further developments of quantitative multidimensional imaging at ultra-low field.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Phantom System Designed to Assess the Effects of Membrane Lipids on Water Proton Relaxation 96%
- Non-negative least squares computation for in vivo myelin mapping using simulated multi-echo spin-echo T2 decay data 96%
- Hierarchical Bayesian Modelling Improves Microstructural Parameter Mapping in Diffusion and Exchange MRI Data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increased Sensitivity and Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Diffusion-Weighted MRI using Multi-Echo Acquisitions 96%
- The dot-compartment revealed? Diffusion MRI with ultra-strong gradients and spherical tensor encoding in the living human brain 95%
- Error quantification in multi-parameter mapping facilitates robust estimation and enhanced group level sensitivity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Correction of Artifacts Induced by B0 Inhomogeneities in Breast MRI using Reduced Field-of-View Echo-Planar Imaging and Enhanced Reverse Polarity Gradient Method 95%
- Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo magnetization transfer ratio and saturation index in mice at 9.4 Tesla 94%
- AI-powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI): a Comprehensive Multiparametric Neurological Protocol from a Single MRI Scan 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.