Back

Integrating Wearable Sensor Technology into Outpatient Rehabilitation Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Miller, A.; Holleran, C.; Bland, M.; Crumley, M.; Jensen, B.; Lohse, K.; Fitzsimmons-Craft, E.; Newman, C.; Maddox, T.; Lang, C.

2026-09-10 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.09.04.26362284 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The disconnect between episodic in-clinic assessments and patients goals to improve activity in daily life presents a challenge in rehabilitation. Wearable sensors are promising for addressing this disconnect but are not part of routine practice. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a digital health solution that integrated wearable sensor technology into outpatient rehabilitation. Methods: Using an iterative user-centered design approach, a digital solution was built that integrated data from a wrist sensor into the electronic health record (EHR). The feasibility, usability, and resources required of the solution were evaluated in a 9-month proof-of-concept study in outpatient rehabilitation. Results: 17 clinicians and 38 patients (median monitoring duration: 42 days) participated. Patient adherence to daily data syncing was a median of 68.6% and was not significantly correlated with digital technology self-efficacy (r = 0.03, p = 0.86). Recent sensor data ([≤] 3 days old) were available in the EHR for 90.2% (193/214) of clinic visits, and clinicians viewed these data in 81.9% (158/193) of these visits. Overall user-friendliness on the System Usability Scale received a median rating of "good" from both patients and clinicians. Resources included costs to build the data transfer pipeline, a 24-month build timeline, and ongoing technical support. Conclusions: By combining user-centered design principles with dedicated resources, we built a feasible and usable digital health solution to bridge the gap between brief clinic visits and daily life in outpatient rehabilitation. These results and future refinements will facilitate broader-scale implementation of sensor technology in rehabilitation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.