Integrating Wearable Sensor Technology into Outpatient Rehabilitation Care: A Proof-of-Concept Study
Miller, A.; Holleran, C.; Bland, M.; Crumley, M.; Jensen, B.; Lohse, K.; Fitzsimmons-Craft, E.; Newman, C.; Maddox, T.; Lang, C.
Show abstract
Background: The disconnect between episodic in-clinic assessments and patients goals to improve activity in daily life presents a challenge in rehabilitation. Wearable sensors are promising for addressing this disconnect but are not part of routine practice. The purpose of this study was to develop and test a digital health solution that integrated wearable sensor technology into outpatient rehabilitation. Methods: Using an iterative user-centered design approach, a digital solution was built that integrated data from a wrist sensor into the electronic health record (EHR). The feasibility, usability, and resources required of the solution were evaluated in a 9-month proof-of-concept study in outpatient rehabilitation. Results: 17 clinicians and 38 patients (median monitoring duration: 42 days) participated. Patient adherence to daily data syncing was a median of 68.6% and was not significantly correlated with digital technology self-efficacy (r = 0.03, p = 0.86). Recent sensor data ([≤] 3 days old) were available in the EHR for 90.2% (193/214) of clinic visits, and clinicians viewed these data in 81.9% (158/193) of these visits. Overall user-friendliness on the System Usability Scale received a median rating of "good" from both patients and clinicians. Resources included costs to build the data transfer pipeline, a 24-month build timeline, and ongoing technical support. Conclusions: By combining user-centered design principles with dedicated resources, we built a feasible and usable digital health solution to bridge the gap between brief clinic visits and daily life in outpatient rehabilitation. These results and future refinements will facilitate broader-scale implementation of sensor technology in rehabilitation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 93%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 93%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of Adults with Upper-limb Difference and their Views on Sensory Feedback for Prostheses: A Mixed Methods Study 93%
- Comparison of vibrotactile and joint-torque feedback in a myoelectric upper-limb prosthesis 92%
- Overground robotic walker use in the home and community: a six-month prospective cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Methods for analytical validation of novel digital clinical measures: A simulation study 94%
- Validity and reliability of an app-based medical device to empower individuals in evaluating their physical capacities 93%
- Development of the AD F ICE_IT clinical decision support system to assist deprescribing of fall-risk increasing drugs: A user-centered design approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility characteristics of wrist-worn fitness trackers in health status monitoring for post-COVID patients in remote and rural areas 96%
- Conversational, Longitudinal, Ecological Assessment (CLEA): Exploring a new AI-driven method for qualitative data collection in a behavioural health context 92%
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model 94%
- Assessment of physiological signs associated with COVID-19 measured using wearable devices 93%
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.