Balancing optimization and standardization in multisite fMRI data analyses to address site-specific parameters
Hoeppli, M.-E.; Pascual-Diaz, S.; Biggs, E. E.; Simons, L. E.; Coghill, R. C.; Lopez-Sola, M.; King, C.; Aghaeepour, N.; Angst, M.; Gaudilliere, B. L. J.; Stinson, J. N.; Moayedi, M.
Show abstract
Multisite functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies are rapidly becoming the norm to allow the acquisition of large samples required to perform advanced statistical techniques, e.g. machine learning. However, acquiring data at multiple sites includes methodological and technical challenges due to the difference in the facilities of each site, such as scanner manufacturer and model. These new challenges add to the already well-known challenges of fMRI data, including scanner-related noise, participant movement, and physiological confounds. To ensure the optimal quality of data, a balance needs to be achieved between standardizing data preprocessing across sites and optimizing within-site data preprocessing. To define the optimal preprocessing pipeline including standard steps and additional denoising technique for our multisite dataset, we first tested 3 commonly used preprocessing pipelines, i.e. fMRIPrep, FSL, and CONN. These pipelines all include standard steps, e.g. motion correction, temporal filter, etc. In a second step, to further improve signal quality, we tested the efficiency of 3 additional denoising techniques on the output of the data preprocessed with the previously defined pipeline. These techniques included aCompCor, FSL FIX and ICA-AROMA. Signal quality was quantified as temporal signal-to-noise ratio (tSNR) across and within sites. Our results show that the performance of the preprocessing pipeline and denoising technique varies between sites. FSL yielded the highest tSNR at two sites and fMRIPrep at the third, revealing a significant site x pipeline interaction. An FSL-based pipeline with minimal adjustment to accommodate site-specific parameters and followed by denoising using a single FSL FIX classifier, which was custom-trained across sites, achieved the highest quality of signal in our data and yielded the greatest consistency in improved data quality across sites. Because of the potential of this pipeline to adequately identify and address site-specific noise, while remaining constant across sites, we selected it as optimal preprocessing pipeline for our dataset.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved motion correction of submillimetre 7T fMRI time series with boundary-based registration (BBR) 97%
- Comparing the efficacy of data-driven denoising methods for a multi-echo fMRI acquisition at 7T 96%
- Slice-direction geometric distortion evaluation and correction with reversed slice-select gradient acquisitions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multi-measure approach for assessing the performance of fMRI preprocessing strategies in resting-state functional connectivity 96%
- Advancing High-Resolution 7T Diffusion MRI: Evaluating Phase-Encoding Correction Strategies for Distortion Correction from Basic to Four-Way Acquisitions 95%
- Estimation of in-scanner head pose changes during structural MRI using a convolutional neural network trained on eye tracker video 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revisiting Amplitude of Low-Frequency Fluctuations (ALFF) in Resting-state fMRI: Clarifications and Improvements 96%
- Isolating the Sources of Pipeline-Variability in Group-Level Task-fMRI results 95%
- Typicality of Functional Connectivity robustly captures motion artifacts in rs-fMRI across datasets, atlases and preprocessing pipelines 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Global signal regression reduces connectivity patterns related to physiological signals and does not alter EEG-derived connectivity 93%
- Dynamic off-resonance correction improves functional image analysis in fMRI of awake behaving non-human primates 93%
- Structural brain imaging predicts individual-level task activation maps using deep learning 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.