Quantification of patient motion in FDG-PET/CT brain imaging
Mackova, K.; Dudasova, K.; Jezdik, P.; Kalina, A.; Ebel, M.; Janca, R.
Show abstract
Objectives FDG-PET is an important imaging tool in evaluation of neurological disorders, including drug-resistant epilepsy. Head motion can degrade PET image quality; however, the extent in routine examinations remains insufficiently characterized. This retrospective study aimed to quantify the magnitude and pattern of head motion in brain FDG-PET/CT and establish displacement-based scores for describing motion severity. Materials & Methods The analysis included 140 patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing brain FDG-PET/CT, with 27 examined under general anesthesia as a reference group. PET acquisition comprised five consecutive 2-min frames. Head motion was quantified by rigid PET-to-PET registration and expressed as maximal displacement. Two experienced readers independently graded motion on a four-point ordinal scale. Ordinal logistic regression with repeated 10-fold cross-validation was used to derive displacement thresholds corresponding to visual motion scores. Results Patients without anesthesia demonstrated greater maximal displacement than the reference group (median, 2.6 vs. 0.7 mm; p < 0.001). Displacement increased throughout acquisition, peaking in the final frame in 85.7% of examinations. Motion predominantly involved inferior-superior translation and rotation around left-right axis, corresponding to head flexion-extension. Maximal displacement was strongly associated with visual motion grades (Kendall's Tau;=0.68-0.70; p < 0.001). Derived thresholds classified displacement >3.25 mm as moderate and >6.4 mm as severe motion. In total, 40.7% of patients without anesthesia demonstrated moderate or severe motion, with severe motion in 12.4%. Conclusion Clinically relevant head motion was frequent in brain FDG-PET/CT despite head fixation, predominantly characterized by flexion-extension. Registration-based displacement provided an objective measure closely associated with expert visual assessment.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ablation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Hyperintensity Clusters and Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Improves Seizure Outcomes after Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy 92%
- Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in the Basal Ganglia Across Epilepsy Subtypes 92%
- Thalamocortical structural connectivity in children with focal epilepsy: a diffusion MRI, case-control study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic comparison of gray and white matter coverage between depth and surface intracranial electrodes in epilepsy: a patient-specific modeling and empirical study 90%
- Dynamic network properties of the interictal brain determine whether seizures appear focal or generalised 90%
- Non-invasively measured brain activity and radiological progression in diffuse glioma 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Test-retest reproducibility of in vivo magnetization transfer ratio and saturation index in mice at 9.4 Tesla 90%
- T2-weighted T1 mapping and automated segmentation of CSF: Assessment of solute gradients in the healthy brain 90%
- AI-powered Gradient Echo Plural Contrast Imaging (AI-GEPCI): a Comprehensive Multiparametric Neurological Protocol from a Single MRI Scan 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ambulatory Video EEG extended to 10 days: A retrospective review of a large database of ictal events 91%
- Internal and External Validation of Comprehensive High-Frequency Activity Biomarkers for Epilepsy Surgery 91%
- Amplitude of high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of the seizure onset zone 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.