Proximal and Distal Bimanual Motor Skill Learning After Stroke: Impairments, Trajectories, and Clinical Contributors
van Ravestyn, C.; Bihin, B.; Lambert, J.; Herman, B.; Crevecoeur, F.; Lejeune, T.; Vandermeeren, Y.
Show abstract
Background. Although coordination between the upper limbs (ULs) is essential for daily life activities and may benefit from early post-stroke plasticity, how patients early after stroke achieve bimanual motor skill learning (bim-MSkL) remains poorly understood. We investigated whether acute and subacute stroke patients retained bim-MSkL capacity, whether bimanual control policy and motor sequence were dissociable components, whether bim-MSkL was more impaired in the distal than proximal UL segment, and whether clinical factors predicted bim-MSkL. Methods. Ninety-seven (sub)acute stroke patients and 60 age-matched healthy individuals (HI) trained over three days on proximal and distal bimanual tasks in this randomized trial. Baseline motor and neuropsychological impairments were assessed. On day 3, participants were randomized into two subgroups on the proximal task to dissociate control policy from motor sequence. Learning trajectories, perturbation-related performance disruption, and predictors of improvement were analyzed. Results. Accuracy and coordination improved in patients on both the distal and proximal tasks over three days, although less than in HI, while proximal speed improvement remained limited. Control policy swap induced larger performance disruption than motor sequence change, whereas the relearning slopes did not differ in patients. Unlike HI, patients showed no proximal-to-distal gradient in bim-MSkL despite greater distal than proximal baseline impairment. Baseline tasks performances, subacute motor and attentional impairments were the strongest predictors of bim-MSkL impairment early after stroke. Conclusions. Most patients with mild-to-moderate impairment exhibited substantial residual proximal and distal bimanual motor learning capacity early after stroke. Impairment profiles support individualized bimanual rehabilitation strategies integrating both motor and cognitive demands.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensorimotor upper limb therapy does not improve somatosensory function and may negatively interfere with motor recovery: a randomized controlled trial in the early rehabilitation phase after stroke 96%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 94%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal trajectories of global and domain-specific cognition after stroke using the Oxford Cognitive Screen 96%
- Continuous theta-burst stimulation of the contralesional primary motor cortex for promotion of upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized controlled trial 94%
- When two communication differences intersect: Comparing inpatient rehabilitation care and outcomes for people with post-stroke aphasia who do and do not require an interpreter 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of bilateral and unilateral mental practice on actual motor performance and event-related desynchronization 95%
- Characterizing upper extremity motor behavior in the first week after stroke 95%
- Relationship between the rate of perceived stability, electrodermal activity and task performance during balance challenges in chronic stroke 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.