Back

Effects of Uninterrupted and Interrupted Sitting on Central Blood Pressure in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Faulkner, J.; Lambrick, D.; Fryer, S.; Stone, K.; Hannah, S.; Hudson, N.; Stoner, L.; Mitchelmore, A.

2026-09-07 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.09.02.26362083 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND Sedentary behaviour independently contributes to cardiovascular disease risk. In healthy adults, prolonged uninterrupted sitting acutely elevates blood pressure, whereas light-activity breaks attenuate this response. Whether such strategies confer similar benefits in high-risk populations, such as chronic stroke survivors, remains unanswered. OBJECTIVES To determine whether non-ambulatory, seated heel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes would attenuate central systolic blood pressure (cSBP) during 3 hours of prolonged sitting in individuals with chronic stroke. We hypothesized that the experimental (heel-raise interruption) condition (EXP) would significantly mitigate the cSBP response relative to uninterrupted sitting (CON). METHODS Using a randomized crossover design, 15 chronic stroke patients (X = 69.3; SD = 10.8 y; 10 male) completed two 3-hour conditions: CON and EXP (10 seated bi-lateral heel raises at 1 rep per second every 10 minutes). Central and peripheral blood pressures were assessed pre- and post-each condition using the SphygmoCor XCEL. Condition by Time interactions were tested using repeated-measures ANOVA. RESULTS The primary hypothesis was confirmed: a significant Condition by Time interaction was detected for cSBP (p < 0.05; partial eta squared = 0.28), with EXP eliciting a smaller increase than CON (5.6 mmHg [95% CI;6.4, 17.6] vs. 9.6 mmHg [95%CI; 2.4, 21.6]). CONCLUSIONS Heel-raise interruptions every 10 minutes attenuate the cSBP response to prolonged sitting in chronic stroke patients and reduce cardiac workload. Frequent, non-ambulatory activity breaks represent a practical secondary prevention strategy for this population, though higher intensity or frequency may be required to fully protect vascular function.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.