Government Healthcare Cost Trends and Fiscal Forecast in Kuwait: A Longitudinal Analysis and Scenario-Based Projection, 2020 - 2035
AlSabah, A. M.
Show abstract
Kuwait's government funded universal healthcare system faces escalating fiscal pressure from a high non communicable disease burden, rapid population growth, and sustained capital investment under Kuwait Vision 2035. No peer reviewed study has previously produced quantitative, scenario based fiscal projections for Kuwait's healthcare sector denominated in Kuwaiti dinars and benchmarked against gross domestic product. This longitudinal secondary analysis draws on the WHO Global Health Expenditure Database, World Bank national accounts, and Kuwait Ministry of Health statistical reports to document Kuwait's government healthcare expenditure trajectory from 2020 to 2024 and construct three scenario based fiscal projections through 2035 using a deterministic modelling approach with explicit, fully documented parameters. Government healthcare expenditure grew from KWD 1.48 billion (5.0% of GDP) in 2020 to KWD 2.22 billion (5.2% of GDP) in 2024, a nominal increase of 50%. Under the baseline scenario, expenditure is projected to reach KWD 4.83 billion (6.9% of GDP) by 2035, with a worst case trajectory of 7.9% of GDP in a sustained low oil price environment. Six principal cost drivers are identified, with non communicable disease burden constituting the most significant structural driver projected to account for 40 to 45% of total health expenditure by 2035 in the absence of intervention. The combined implementation of 15 evidence based policy recommendations spanning fiscal reform, system efficiency, and non communicable disease prevention is projected to contain the health to GDP ratio 0.7 to 1.2 percentage points below the baseline trajectory by 2035, yielding annual fiscal savings of KWD 490 to 840 million. These findings provide the first quantitative fiscal forecast for Kuwait's healthcare sector and offer a directly applicable policy framework for all six Gulf Cooperation Council states.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Willingness and Perceived ability to pay for Ugandas Proposed National Health Insurance Scheme among Informal Sector workers in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda: A Contingent Valuation Method. 94%
- Examining Health Sector Stakeholder Perceptions on the Efficiency of County Health Systems in Kenya 93%
- Impact of school closures and reopening on COVID-19 caseload in 6 cities of Pakistan: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multidimensional vulnerability and financial risk protection in health in contexts of protracted conflict: Evidence from the Occupied Palestinian Territory 94%
- Assessing the Hospital Surge Capacity of the Kenyan Health System in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Costs, catastrophic out-of-pocket payments and impoverishment related to accessing surgical care among households in rural Ethiopia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An analysis of humanitarian and health aid harmonisation over a decade (2011-2019) of the Syrian conflict 93%
- Identifying Priority Countries for Scaling Up Small-Quantity Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements 93%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and response on the utilisation of health services during the first wave in Kinshasa, the Democratic Republic of the Congo 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.