Back

Secondary causes among adult patients presenting with first-episode psychosis to acute medical settings in Hong Kong: A 10-Year retrospective study

Chau, S. W. H.; Lam, L. K.; Yu, M. P.; Wong, Y. C.; Choi, J. C.; Leung, H. H.

2026-09-04 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.09.02.26362044 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The prevalence and pattern of secondary causes of first-onset psychosis (FEP) in Asian populations are understudied. Our objectives are to investigate the prevalence and pattern of secondary causes of FEP presenting in an acute medical setting in a metropolitan, Chinese-predominant population, and to investigate the prevalence and pattern of undiagnosed conditions presenting as psychosis. Method This is a retrospective observational study. We reviewed medical records of patients referred to the consultation psychiatry team at a tertiary acute teaching hospital in Hong Kong from January 2015 to Apr 2025. The inclusion criteria of the study are 1) age 18-64 at the time of the assessment, and 2) FEP confirmed by the consultation liaison team. Patients diagnosed with delirium were excluded. Result Among the 384 patients included in the study (mean age = 40.0 {+/-}13.7 years, 69% female), secondary causes of psychosis were found in 9.6% (n=37) of the cohort. Substance use is the most common secondary cause found (n=11, 2.9% of all FEPs) overall. Among those with secondary psychoses, patients' underlying conditions were revealed only by the workup in relation to the FEP in 16 of them, of which definitive or probable autoimmune encephalitis (n=5) and early-onset dementia (n=4) were the most common conditions uncovered. Conclusion The prevalence of secondary psychoses in our FEP cohort is lower than published international figures. Clinicians need to be aware of the suspicious clinical features suggestive of autoimmune encephalitis and early-onset dementia in FEP patients with otherwise unremarkable past history and toxicology test.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.