Back

UKB-KG: Knowledge Graph for Integrating and Enhancing Biomedical Insights from the UK Biobank

Wang, Z.; Wang, J.; Shen, Y.; Gao, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Cheng, C.; Yu, K.; Zhu, H.; Ye, J.

2026-09-07 health informatics
10.64898/2026.09.02.26361902 medRxiv
Show abstract

The UK Biobank (UKB) is a cornerstone of modern biomedical research, providing unparalleled data to advance the understanding, prediction, and treatment of diseases. Its contributions span genetics, genomics, disease prediction, and long-term follow-up studies, driving transformative advancements in public health and precision medicine. However, the fragmentation of research outcomes across numerous publications limits analytic efficiency and cross-study integration. To address this, we developed UKB Knowledge Graph (UKB-KG), a high-quality medical knowledge graph constructed using large language models (LLMs) with 88.8% precision as assessed by GPT-5.4. Integrating data from approximately 9,200 UKB-related publications. UKB-KG comprises 292,328 triples enriched with contextual attributes such as source information and demographic details. It reveals intricate relationships among diseases, genes, chemicals, lifestyle factors, and other biomedical entities, while a dynamic scoring mechanism enhances triple retrieval accuracy. Evaluations highlight UKB-KG's transformative potential. (i) Embedding UKB-KG into multi-disease prediction models improves AUROC, AUPRC, and F1 scores by 8.1%, 6.2%, and 2.7%, respectively, for rare diseases. (ii) A tailored retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach boosted LLM accuracy by 13.2% on PubMedQA. and (iii) A user-friendly platform enhances accessibility for researchers. By unifying fragmented research and enabling robust data exploration, UKB-KG emerges as a powerful tool for advancing biomedical research and driving innovative healthcare applications.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.