Back

Association of Pluslife MiniDock MTB time-to-positivity with tuberculosis bacterial load: a diagnostic study in Indonesia

Korompis, M.; Veeken, L. D.; Hartati, S.; Fatma, Z. H.; Chaidir, L.; Eristiana, N.; Setiabudiawan, T.; van Ingen, J.; van Crevel, R.; Hill, P. C.; Houben, R. M. G. J.; Alisjahbana, B.; Koesoemadinata, R. C.

2026-09-04 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.09.01.26361863 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objectives: The near point-of-care (nPOC) Pluslife MiniDock MTB (MiniDock) assay does not report semiquantitative values. We evaluated whether categorized MiniDock time-to-positivity (TTP) serves as a quantitative proxy for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) bacterial load. Methods: Presumptive tuberculosis (TB) patients enrolled across 27 health facilities in Indonesia were tested with sputum GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert), MiniDock sputum swabs, and tongue swabs. Positive results were categorized using a median split at 13 minutes ([&le;]13, 13-25, and 25 minute). MiniDock TTP categories were evaluated against Xpert semiquantitative grades and BACTEC MGIT 960 liquid culture TTP (days). Results: Of 2974 presumptive TB participants tested with sputum Xpert, 426 (14.3%) were sputum Xpert-positive. MiniDock detected Mtb in 248/299 (83.0%) sputum and 263/382 (68.8%) tongue swab. Among 248 Minidock sputum-positive results, 99 (39.9%) turned positive [&le;]13 minutes, 107 (43.1%) between 13 and 25 minutes, and 42 (16.9%) at 25 minutes. Minidock TTP categories correlated with sputum and tongue swab semiquantitative results as well as with culture time to positivity (p<0.001). Conclusions: MiniDock TTP categories ([&le;]13, 13-25, 25 minutes) provide meaningful stratification which correlates with both Xpert semiquantitative and culture TTP. Time to Positivity from nPOC could thus serve as a proxy for bacterial burden and infectiousness, strongly increasing its utility for clinical care, public health and research.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.