Back

Differential Biofilm Susceptibility and Potent Isavuconazole Post-Antifungal Effect Distinguish Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis from Trichosporon asahii

Yoshinouchi, T.; Nakamura, T.; Mori, D.; Yasunaga, J.-i.; Tanaka, Y.

2026-08-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.30.748177 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cutaneotrichosporon dermatis (formerly Trichosporon dermatis) is a basidiomycetous yeast-like fungus known to cause summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis, although its virulence in humans remains poorly understood. We performed morphological and molecular identification of an isolate from the sputum and blood cultures of an immunocompromised patient, together with pathogenicity assessment using a Galleria mellonella model, biofilm formation/eradication assays, antifungal susceptibility testing, drug combination effects, and the post-antifungal effect (PAFE), compared with Trichosporon asahii. The isolate was identified as C. dermatis by ITS/IGS1 sequencing, supported by phylogenetic analysis. Growth of C. dermatis increased more at 37 than at 25. In the Galleria mellonella assay, C. dermatis, T. asahii, and Candida albicans each showed dose-dependent pathogenicity at sufficiently high inocula, although Rhizopus oryzae was the most potent pathogen on a per-CFU basis. C. dermatis formed biofilms that were more completely inhibited by terbinafine (TRB) and amphotericin B (AmB) than azole agents, which showed only partial inhibitory activity even at high concentrations. Susceptibility testing showed relatively strong susceptibility to AmB and azole agents. In the TRB and azole combination assay, the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) was below 0.5, indicating synergy. Isavuconazole (ISC) showed a markedly stronger PAFE than the other azole agents tested. These findings indicate that although azoles show only partial efficacy against its biofilm, C. dermatis can still cause invasive infection, and that azole monotherapy or TRB and azole combination therapy, aided by the potent PAFE of ISC, may represent effective treatment options.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.