Revision of the Community Conservation Index
Macadam, C. R.
Show abstract
The Community Conservation Index (CCI) developed by Chadd and Extence (2004) has been widely used to assess the conservation value of freshwater macroinvertebrate assemblages by integrating species rarity and community richness into a single metric. However, the original conservation scoring system was based largely on historical rarity designations and regional distribution data that no longer reflect current conservation assessments or recording coverage. This paper presents a comprehensive revision of the Conservation Scores underpinning the CCI. Species scores were updated using the latest IUCN-compliant Red List assessments for British freshwater invertebrates. For taxa classified as Least Concern, Data Deficient, or lacking a recent conservation assessment, scores were derived from national occurrence data across Great Britain for the period 1995-2024 using hectad occupancy. In addition, all non-native species were assigned a conservation score of zero to ensure they do not contribute positively to site conservation value. The revised dataset includes 1,680 taxa, compared with 1,117 in the original index, with 755 taxa receiving Conservation Scores for the first time. Thirty non-native taxa were assigned a score of zero. Among previously scored taxa, 165 received higher scores, 576 received lower scores, and 184 remained unchanged. The predominance of score reductions reflects improved knowledge of species distributions and the replacement of historical rarity classifications with contemporary assessments based on conservation status and national frequency of taxon occupancy. The revised CCI maintains the original strengths of combining rarity and richness while improving transparency, consistency and ecological relevance. By incorporating current Red List assessments, Great Britain-wide distribution data and revised treatment of non-native species, the updated index provides a more robust and nationally representative measure of freshwater macroinvertebrate conservation value. It offers an enhanced tool for biodiversity assessment, conservation prioritisation, site designation and environmental decision-making across freshwater ecosystems in Great Britain.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A globally influential area-condition metric is a poor proxy for invertebrate biodiversity 93%
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems 93%
- Proving a negative; estimating species 'Confidence in Absence for Decision-Making' (CIADM) using environmental DNA monitoring 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA 94%
- Generating and testing ecological hypotheses at the pondscape with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a case study on a threatened amphibian 94%
- eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical application of indicators for genetic diversity in CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework implementation 93%
- Advancing ecological assessment: The integration of eDNA metabarcoding into an estuarine fish index 92%
- Integrated Plankton and Trace Metal Analysis asIndicators of Organic Pollution Threats fromCarp-Cultured Ponds to Adjacent Ecosystems:Implications for Sustainability 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.