Back

Rapid isothermal amplification of diatom rbcL from eDNA and eRNA reveals their abundance and photosynthetic physiology

Verret, F. G.; Hartle-Mougiou, K.; Chantzaras, C.; Peltekis, A.; Margiotta, F.; Sarno, D.; Cardini, U.; Alba, M.; Pizziol, V.; Markopoulos, I.; Papadopoulou, I.; Percopo, I.; Tramontano, F.; Maselli, M.; Novellino, A.; Psarra, S.; Montresor, M.; Mowlem, M. C.; Gizeli, E.; Valiadi, M.

2026-08-31 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.30.748096 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Diatoms are major contributors to marine primary production, yet current approaches for monitoring their abundance and function rely on coarse satellite chlorophyll estimates or sparse cell count and carbon fixation measurements. Molecular markers are a promising approach for high-resolution measurement of both abundance and metabolic activity through analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) and RNA (eRNA). We present an isothermal quantitative recombinase polymerase amplification (qRPA) assay targeting rbcL gene copies and transcripts of marine diatoms, operating at low temperature and producing results in less than 15 min. We demonstrate specificity and calibration across diverse diatom taxa, then apply the assay to eDNA and eRNA samples from the Mare Chiara Long-Term Ecological Research site in the Bay of Naples, Italy, alongside microscopy, chlorophyll, physicochemical, and carbon-fixation data. Diatom rbcL DNA tracked abundance across five orders of magnitude despite seasonal shifts in community composition. Combining molecular and optical data revealed increased cellular rbcL copies and chlorophyll in low-light winter populations, suggesting enhanced photosynthetic capacity despite lower abundance. Furthermore, rbcL RNA reflected total carbon fixation rates and identified populations with differing carbon fixation activity. These results support rapid, RPA-based rbcL quantification as a robust approach for biomolecular ocean observing.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.