BioIMA: a one-click desktop tool for standardized extraction of phenotypic traits from biological images
Qumu, X.; Dan, X.; Feng, J.; Cui, Y.; Gong, Y.; Hou, Y.; Lai, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, F.; Todesco, M.; Wang, J.
Show abstract
Standardized extraction of quantitative phenotypes from images is increasingly important across plant biology, from ecological and evolutionary studies to genetics, breeding, and functional genomics. However, as large image datasets are increasingly used for trait analysis, many biologically relevant traits, including size, shape, color, and spatial patterning, are still measured manually or using fragmented semi-automated workflows. These limitations reduce throughput, reproducibility, and accessibility, especially for researchers without computational expertise. Here, we present BioIMA, an open-source desktop tool for rapid and standardized phenotyping from biological images. BioIMA integrates foundation model-based segmentation with automated trait computation, allowing users to extract quantitative measurements from images through an intuitive graphical interface and without model training. To validate its performance, we quantified a set of knot morphological traits in two Populus species, as these measurements are typically time-consuming to perform manually. Automatic measurements showed strong agreement with manual ImageJ-based measurements (R2 > 0.95), while reducing per-image processing time by approximately 75% (from ~15 s to ~4 s). BioIMA was further applied to diverse plant datasets, including Helianthus and Rhododendron images with varying morphologies and background conditions. Although developed for plant phenotyping, BioIMA may also be extended to other biological samples where region-based size, shape, or color traits are of interest. By combining accessibility and standardization in a lightweight local application, BioIMA provides a practical community resource for image-based phenotyping in ecological and evolutionary studies.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CuticleTrace: A toolkit for capturing cell outlines of leaf cuticle with implications for paleoecology and paleoclimatology 95%
- Procrustean pseudo-landmark methods in Python to measure massive quantities of leaf shape data 94%
- FloraTraiter: Automated parsing of traits from descriptive biodiversity literature 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing root phenotyping: Assessing the impact of camera calibration on 3D root reconstruction 94%
- Developmental Normalization of Phenomics Data Generated by High Throughput Plant Phenotyping Systems 94%
- PI-Plat: A high-resolution image-based 3D reconstruction method to estimate growth dynamics of rice inflorescence traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.