Empowering adults to manage their hearing loss: assessing the benefits of user-controlled, smartphone-connected hearing aids.
Maidment, D. W.; Habib, A.; Gomez, R.; Benton, C.; Ferguson, M. A.
Show abstract
The availability of hearing aids that can connect wirelessly to smartphone technologies via Bluetooth has grown exponentially in recent years. However, there is limited evidence assessing the benefits of user-adjustability afforded by these devices. This study aimed to assess the benefits of smartphone-connected hearing aids and an accompanying application (or app) in new and existing hearing aid users. In this single-centre, prospective, observational study, 44 adult hearing aid users (14 new and 30 existing) were recruited. Participants were fitted bilaterally with smartphone-connected hearing aids that could be adjusted by the user via an app. Self-reported outcome measures were collected at fitting and after seven-weeks of using the device in everyday life. For both new and existing hearing aid users, significant improvements in social participation, hearing-related fatigue, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction were found. For existing hearing aid users, all outcomes were significantly better for the smartphone-connected hearing aids plus app in comparison to their existing hearing aids that did not connect to a smartphone, all with moderate-to-large clinical effect sizes (d> .6). User-controllability via the app was identified as the key benefit, and most participants (68%) reported that the app met their needs 'extremely' or 'very well'. These results suggest that, when used in conjunction with an app, smartphone-connected hearing aids can improve hearing outcomes due to greater user-controllability to improve listening. Thus, smartphone-connected hearing aids have the potential to facilitate patient-centred care, empowering the individual to successfully manage their hearing loss.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users 95%
- Adaptive hearing aid benefit in children with mild/moderate hearing loss: A registered, double-blind, randomized clinical trial 94%
- Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of executive function training on balance and auditory-cognitive dual-task performance in adults with and without hearing loss 93%
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 93%
- Digital thErapy For Improved tiNnitus carE Study (DEFINE): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Identification of Tinnitus Malingering Based on Overt and Covert Behavioral Responses During Psychoacoustic Testing 92%
- Understanding digital health technology implementation in rehabilitation: Development of the Rehabilitation Technologies Implementation model 89%
- Smartphone-Based Symbol-Digit Modalities Test Reliably Measures Cognitive Function in Multiple Sclerosis Patients 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 93%
- Applicability of a short form of the Speech, Spatial und Qualities of Hearing Scale in 97 individuals with Meniere's disease in a multicentric registry 92%
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery 93%
- Tinnitus Subtyping with Subgrouping Within Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study 91%
- Speech-driven Facial Animations Improve Speech-in-Noise Comprehension of Humans 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.